Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason()

Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-18T15:52:13Z

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a
> > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY.
>
> Other way around.
>

Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call
dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid
on a MEMCPY channel.

Arnd