From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FLEXfI022361 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:14:33 -0500 Received: from smtp127.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp127.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.32]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n1FLEIEZ012980 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: <499885A9.2040905@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:14:17 -0500 From: CityK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacek Pawlowski References: <4993B1C4.8080607@myecho.ca> In-Reply-To: <4993B1C4.8080607@myecho.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: HVR-950A (HVR-850) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Jacek Pawlowski wrote: > Any news about analog support for HVR-950Q and HVR-850 (model model > 72301, 2040:7240 basically the same as 950Q)? > cheers > -- jacek Yes, it came 3 days before your own message: http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=123419514523631&w=2 Previous to that, Robert had expressed interest, as read here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=122459807631633&w=2 . But if you continue reading through the first thread, you will see that he has evidently pursued a different route. So, it would rather appear that unless someone is quietly (i.e. hasn't announced and/or prefers not to announce) working on analog support for the au0828 IC, I wouldn't count on anything forthcoming. Being that case, I would encourage anyone who is really interested in such support to consider leading the pursuit to that end. -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list