From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu,
Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>,
Olivier Lorin <o.lorin@laposte.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a control for Sensor Orientation
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:25:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4999774E.9000600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42583.62.70.2.252.1234792848.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> If you want to add two bits with
>>> mount information, feel free. But don't abuse them for pivot
>>> information.
>>> If you want that, then add another two bits for the rotation:
>>>
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_VFLIP 0x0400
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_HFLIP 0x0800
>>>
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_PIVOT_0 0x0000
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_PIVOT_90 0x1000
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_PIVOT_180 0x2000
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_PIVOT_270 0x3000
>>> #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_PIVOT_MSK 0x3000
>>>
>> Ok, this seems good. But if we want to distinguish between static sensor
>> mount
>> information, and dynamic sensor orientation changing due to pivotting,
>> then I
>> think we should only put the pivot flags in the buffer flags, and the
>> static
>> flags should be in the VIDIOC_QUERYCAP capabilities flag, what do you
>> think of
>> that?
>
> That's for driver global information. This type of information is
> input-specific (e.g. input 1 might be from an S-Video input and does not
> require v/hflip, and input 2 is from a sensor and does require v/hflip).
> So struct v4l2_input seems a good place for it.
>
> Looking at v4l2_input there is a status field, but the status information
> is valid for the current input only. We can:
>
> 1) add flags here and only set the mounting information for the current
> input,
>
> 2) add flags here and document that these flags are valid for any input,
> not just the current, or:
>
> 3) take one of the reserved fields and turn that into a 'flags' field that
> can be used for static info about the input.
>
> To be honest, I prefer 3.
>
> The same can be done for v4l2_output should it become necessary in the
> future.
>
> Actually, pivot information could be stored here as well. Doing that makes
> it possible to obtain the orientation without needing to start a capture,
> and makes it possible to be used (although awkwardly) with the read()
> interface.
>
> You still want to report this information in v4l2_buffer as well since it
> can change on the fly.
>
Sounds good to me.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-16 14:00 Adding a control for Sensor Orientation Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 14:25 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2009-02-16 16:09 ` Trent Piepho
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-16 12:02 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 11:01 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 11:12 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-16 12:07 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-16 9:07 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 9:44 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-16 11:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-16 12:19 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-16 14:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-16 15:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-16 15:24 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-16 8:57 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 8:33 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 22:36 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-17 2:00 ` kilgota
2009-02-17 7:27 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-17 22:29 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-14 20:48 Adam Baker
2009-02-14 21:04 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-14 21:55 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-14 21:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-14 22:44 ` kilgota
2009-02-15 9:08 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-15 9:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-15 9:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-15 13:03 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-15 13:46 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-15 23:09 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-16 1:46 ` kilgota
2009-02-16 3:47 ` hermann pitton
2009-02-16 3:55 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-16 8:30 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-16 2:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-16 4:04 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-16 7:44 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-16 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4999774E.9000600@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=o.lorin@laposte.net \
--cc=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox