public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Stoeber <tobi@to-st.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:29:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A2C0C2.4030703@to-st.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48380.62.70.2.252.1235398197.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>

Hello Hans,

Hans Verkuil schrieb:
> We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the
> minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check,
> right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to
> something newer than 2.6.22.
> 
> Whether we keep our current system or not is a separate discussion:
> whatever development system you choose there will be work involved in
> keeping up the backwards compatibility.

Just out of deep interesst:

Could you, Hans (or anyone else) just explain, what is / are the reason 
to draw the line between kernels 2.6.21 and 2.6.22?

What was the fundamental change there and do these changes as such apply 
to every supported device / driver?

As I understand you, although you drop backport efforts for kernels 
below 2.6.22, you are going to adopt an policy to - in a sense - waste 
development efforts / time on seven instead of 12 kernels?

Wouldn't it then not be more logical to support only the recent kernel 
and the kernel before, becaus in some month time 2.6.30 might include a 
major change which would force you to drop support for < 2.6.29 altogether?

Thanks for your patience and reply,

best regards, Tobias


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-23 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-23 14:09 POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-23 15:29 ` Tobias Stoeber [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-23 16:20 Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22) Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A2C0C2.4030703@to-st.de \
    --to=tobi@to-st.de \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox