From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ayden.softclick-it.de ([217.160.202.102]:33406 "EHLO ayden.softclick-it.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754604AbZBWPa2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:30:28 -0500 Message-ID: <49A2C0C2.4030703@to-st.de> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:29:06 +0100 From: Tobias Stoeber Reply-To: tobi@to-st.de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22) References: <48380.62.70.2.252.1235398197.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <48380.62.70.2.252.1235398197.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Hans, Hans Verkuil schrieb: > We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the > minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check, > right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to > something newer than 2.6.22. > > Whether we keep our current system or not is a separate discussion: > whatever development system you choose there will be work involved in > keeping up the backwards compatibility. Just out of deep interesst: Could you, Hans (or anyone else) just explain, what is / are the reason to draw the line between kernels 2.6.21 and 2.6.22? What was the fundamental change there and do these changes as such apply to every supported device / driver? As I understand you, although you drop backport efforts for kernels below 2.6.22, you are going to adopt an policy to - in a sense - waste development efforts / time on seven instead of 12 kernels? Wouldn't it then not be more logical to support only the recent kernel and the kernel before, becaus in some month time 2.6.30 might include a major change which would force you to drop support for < 2.6.29 altogether? Thanks for your patience and reply, best regards, Tobias