From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp0.lie-comtel.li ([217.173.238.80]:52778 "EHLO smtp0.lie-comtel.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753899AbZCWVqP (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:46:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.lie-comtel.li [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.lie-comtel.li (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B089FEC22 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:46:13 +0100 (GMT-1) Received: from [192.168.0.16] (217-173-228-198.cmts.powersurf.li [217.173.228.198]) by smtp0.lie-comtel.li (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F29A9FEC12 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:46:11 +0100 (GMT-1) Message-ID: <49C80321.60402@kaiser-linux.li> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:46:09 +0100 From: Thomas Kaiser MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: gspca in the LinuxTv wiki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I was thinking about updating my page [1] with the results I get with gspca V2. But I think it would be better to have this info on the LinuxTV wiki. Unfortunately, I did not find a page for gspca. So I thought I should start one, but I don't think this is the right thing because there are other drivers available for webcams. Why not start a "Webcam compatibly page" similar to my page [1]? - a photo of the webcam - USB ID - capabilities of the cam - the chipsets when known - driver + version (+ kernel version), at the time tested - application used for testing (version) - links with some information to other interesting pages - and some more you can think of What you guys think about it? [1] http://www.kaiser-linux.li/index.php/Linux_and_Webcams Thomas PS: the only reference I found about gspca on the LinuxTV wiki: http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Development:_Reverse_Engineering_USB_Webcams#gspca