From: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] CSI camera interface driver for MX1
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:19:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CBD53C.6060700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903261405520.5438@axis700.grange>
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Sascha,
>
> would you prefer me to pull this via soc-camera or you'd prefer to handle
> it in your mxc tree? I think it's better to pull it via v4l, so, I'd need
> your acks for platform parts, especially for the assembly, ksyms and FIQ
> code.
>
> Hi Darius,
>
Hi Guennadi, Sascha,
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Darius wrote:
>
> Please, send your patches inline next time. Also, as noticed inline,
> you'll have to rebase this onto a current v4l stack, e.g., linux-next.
>
ok, I just started to use stgit now.
> From: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>
> Driver for i.MX1/L camera (CSI) host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>
> You are forwarding his patch, so, you have to sign-off under it. Why isn't
> he submitting it himself?
>
clear. This is because we work together on two archs - MXC and Gemini.
Paulius will maintain all our Gemini patches and I will take care about
MXC, also old patches from Paulius.
I will need some time to study this CSI and driver code, then I could
fix your comments.
Thank you for review and notes!
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/imx_camera.c
> ===================================================================
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/imx_camera.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,872 @@
>> +/*
>> + * V4L2 Driver for i.MX camera (CSI) host
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008, Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>> + *
>> + * Based on PXA SoC camera driver
>> + * Copyright (C) 2006, Sascha Hauer, Pengutronix
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski <kernel@pengutronix.de>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>
>
> Do you really want to allow later GPL versions? I think, v2 only is
> preferred currently.
>
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>> +#include <linux/time.h>
>> +#include <linux/version.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +
>> +#include <media/v4l2-common.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
>> +#include <media/videobuf-dma-contig.h>
>> +#include <media/soc_camera.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/videodev2.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/dma.h>
>> +#include <asm/fiq.h>
>> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include <mach/dma-mx1-mx2.h>
>> +#include <mach/camera.h>
>>
>
> It makes patching a bit easier, if includes are alphabetically ordered.
> So, if in the future you get two patches each adding one <linux/...>
> include, if entries are alphabetically sorted, they might lie apart and
> patches will still apply. Whereas if entries are not sorted, people will
> just append their entries and patches will conflict.
>
>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * CSI registers
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define DMA_DIMR 0x08 /* Interrupt mask Register */
>> +#define DMA_CCR(x) (0x8c + ((x) << 6)) /* Control Registers */
>> +
>> +#define CSICR1 0x00 /* CSI Control Register 1 */
>> +#define CSISR 0x08 /* CSI Status Register */
>> +#define CSIRXR 0x10 /* CSI RxFIFO Register */
>> +
>> +#define CSICR1_RXFF_LEVEL(x) (((x) & 0x3) << 19)
>> +#define CSICR1_SOF_POL (1 << 17)
>> +#define CSICR1_SOF_INTEN (1 << 16)
>> +#define CSICR1_MCLKDIV(x) (((x) & 0xf) << 12)
>> +#define CSICR1_MCLKEN (1 << 9)
>> +#define CSICR1_FCC (1 << 8)
>> +#define CSICR1_BIG_ENDIAN (1 << 7)
>> +#define CSICR1_CLR_RXFIFO (1 << 5)
>> +#define CSICR1_GCLK_MODE (1 << 4)
>> +#define CSICR1_REDGE (1 << 1)
>> +#define CSICR1_EN (1 << 0)
>> +
>> +#define CSISR_SFF_OR_INT (1 << 25)
>> +#define CSISR_RFF_OR_INT (1 << 24)
>> +#define CSISR_STATFF_INT (1 << 21)
>> +#define CSISR_RXFF_INT (1 << 18)
>> +#define CSISR_SOF_INT (1 << 16)
>> +#define CSISR_DRDY (1 << 0)
>> +
>> +#define VERSION_CODE KERNEL_VERSION(0, 0, 1)
>> +#define DRIVER_NAME "imx-csi"
>> +
>> +#define CSI_IRQ_MASK (CSISR_SFF_OR_INT | CSISR_RFF_OR_INT | CSISR_STATFF_INT | \
>> + CSISR_RXFF_INT | CSISR_SOF_INT)
>> +
>> +#define CSI_BUS_FLAGS (SOCAM_MASTER | SOCAM_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH | \
>> + SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH | SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_LOW | \
>> + SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING | SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING | \
>> + SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8)
>> +
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(camera_lock);
>> +
>> +static int mclk;
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Structures
>> + */
>> +
>> +/* buffer for one video frame */
>> +struct imx_buffer {
>> + /* common v4l buffer stuff -- must be first */
>> + struct videobuf_buffer vb;
>>
>
> Here you have one space
>
>
>> +
>> + const struct soc_camera_data_format *fmt;
>>
>
> Here you have 8 spaces
>
>
>> +
>> + int inwork;
>>
>
> Here you have tabs. Please, unify.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct imx_camera_dev {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + /* i.MX is only supposed to handle one camera on its Camera Sensor
>> + * Interface. If anyone ever builds hardware to enable more than
>> + * one camera, they will have to modify this driver too */
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd;
>> +
>> + unsigned int irq;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> +
>> + int dma_chan;
>> +
>> + struct imxcamera_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + unsigned long platform_mclk_10khz;
>> +
>> + struct list_head capture;
>> +
>> + spinlock_t lock;
>> +
>> + struct imx_buffer *active;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const char *imx_cam_driver_description = "i.MX_Camera";
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Videobuf operations
>> + */
>> +static int imx_videobuf_setup(struct videobuf_queue *vq, unsigned int *count,
>> + unsigned int *size)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
>> +
>> + *size = icd->width * icd->height *
>> + ((icd->current_fmt->depth + 7) >> 3);
>> +
>> + if (0 == *count)
>> + *count = 32;
>>
>
> Doesn't look like a good idea to me. You don't restrict picture sizes in
> your try_fmt / set_fmt and here you default to 32 buffers...
>
>
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "count=%d, size=%d\n", *count, *size);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void free_buffer(struct videobuf_queue *vq, struct imx_buffer *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
>>
>
> The compiler should do this for you, but the code would look a bit cleaner
> with a
>
> struct videobuf_buffer *vb = &buf->vb;
>
>
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (vb=0x%p) 0x%08lx %d\n", __func__,
>> + &buf->vb, buf->vb.baddr, buf->vb.bsize);
>> +
>> + /* This waits until this buffer is out of danger, i.e., until it is no
>> + * longer in STATE_QUEUED or STATE_ACTIVE */
>> + videobuf_waiton(&buf->vb, 0, 0);
>> + videobuf_dma_contig_free(vq, &buf->vb);
>> +
>> + buf->vb.state = VIDEOBUF_NEEDS_INIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_videobuf_prepare(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb, enum v4l2_field field)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf = container_of(vb, struct imx_buffer, vb);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (vb=0x%p) 0x%08lx %d\n", __func__,
>> + vb, vb->baddr, vb->bsize);
>> +
>> + /* Added list head initialization on alloc */
>> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vb->queue));
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(NULL == icd->current_fmt);
>> +
>> + /* I think, in buf_prepare you only have to protect global data,
>> + * the actual buffer is yours */
>> + buf->inwork = 1;
>> +
>> + if (buf->fmt != icd->current_fmt ||
>> + vb->width != icd->width ||
>> + vb->height != icd->height ||
>> + vb->field != field) {
>> + buf->fmt = icd->current_fmt;
>> + vb->width = icd->width;
>> + vb->height = icd->height;
>> + vb->field = field;
>> + vb->state = VIDEOBUF_NEEDS_INIT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vb->size = vb->width * vb->height * ((buf->fmt->depth + 7) >> 3);
>> + if (0 != vb->baddr && vb->bsize < vb->size) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (vb->state == VIDEOBUF_NEEDS_INIT) {
>> + ret = videobuf_iolock(vq, vb, NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto fail;
>> +
>> + vb->state = VIDEOBUF_PREPARED;
>> + }
>> +
>> + buf->inwork = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> + free_buffer(vq, buf);
>> +out:
>> + buf->inwork = 0;
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_setup_dma(struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev)
>> +{
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vbuf = &pcdev->active->vb;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(!pcdev->active)) {
>> + dev_err(pcdev->dev, "DMA End IRQ with no active buffer\n");
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* setup sg list for future DMA */
>> + ret = imx_dma_setup_single(pcdev->dma_chan,
>> + videobuf_to_dma_contig(vbuf),
>> + vbuf->size, pcdev->res->start +
>> + CSIRXR, DMA_MODE_READ);
>> + if(unlikely(ret))
>>
>
> Space missing
>
>
>> + dev_err(pcdev->dev, "Failed to setup DMA sg list\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_videobuf_queue(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
>> + struct soc_camera_host *ici =
>> + to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>>
>
> No need to break the line.
>
>
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf = container_of(vb, struct imx_buffer, vb);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (vb=0x%p) 0x%08lx %d\n", __func__,
>> + vb, vb->baddr, vb->bsize);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pcdev->lock, flags);
>>
>
> You use an FIQ for SoF, and spin_lock_irqsave() to protect. Don't they
> only disable IRQs and not FIQs? But it seems your FIQ cannot cause any
> trouble, so, it should be fine. Do you really need an FIQ?
>
>
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&vb->queue, &pcdev->capture);
>> +
>> + vb->state = VIDEOBUF_ACTIVE;
>> +
>> + if (!pcdev->active) {
>> + pcdev->active = buf;
>> +
>> + /* setup sg list for future DMA */
>> + if (!imx_camera_setup_dma(pcdev)) {
>> + unsigned int temp;
>> + /* enable SOF irq */
>> + temp = __raw_readl(pcdev->base + CSICR1) |
>> + CSICR1_SOF_INTEN;
>>
>
> Hm, looks like an error in the datasheet:
>
> SOF_INTEN Start Of Frame Interrupt--SOF interrupt status bit; set Read:
> Bit 16 when interrupt occurs. 0 = No interrupt
> 1 = SOF interrupt occurred
> Write:
> 0 = No action
> 1 = Clears bit
>
> This is not a status bit, but a control "SoF interrupt enable" bit, right?
>
>
>> + __raw_writel(temp, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcdev->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_videobuf_release(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf = container_of(vb, struct imx_buffer, vb);
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (vb=0x%p) 0x%08lx %d\n", __func__,
>> + vb, vb->baddr, vb->bsize);
>> +
>> + switch (vb->state) {
>> + case VIDEOBUF_ACTIVE:
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (active)\n", __func__);
>> + break;
>> + case VIDEOBUF_QUEUED:
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (queued)\n", __func__);
>> + break;
>> + case VIDEOBUF_PREPARED:
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (prepared)\n", __func__);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "%s (unknown)\n", __func__);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + free_buffer(vq, buf);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void imx_camera_wakeup(struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev,
>>
>
> No need for "inline"
>
>
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb,
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf)
>> +{
>> + /* _init is used to debug races, see comment in imx_camera_reqbufs() */
>> + list_del_init(&vb->queue);
>> + vb->state = VIDEOBUF_DONE;
>> + do_gettimeofday(&vb->ts);
>> + vb->field_count++;
>> + wake_up(&vb->done);
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&pcdev->capture)) {
>> + pcdev->active = NULL;
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pcdev->active = list_entry(pcdev->capture.next,
>> + struct imx_buffer, vb.queue);
>> +
>> + /* setup sg list for future DMA */
>> + if (likely(!imx_camera_setup_dma(pcdev))) {
>> + unsigned int temp;
>> +
>> + /* enable SOF irq */
>> + temp = __raw_readl(pcdev->base + CSICR1) | CSICR1_SOF_INTEN;
>> + __raw_writel(temp, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_camera_dma_irq(int channel, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = data;
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pcdev->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + imx_dma_disable(channel);
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(!pcdev->active)) {
>> + dev_err(pcdev->dev, "DMA End IRQ with no active buffer\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vb = &pcdev->active->vb;
>> + buf = container_of(vb, struct imx_buffer, vb);
>> + WARN_ON(buf->inwork || list_empty(&vb->queue));
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s (vb=0x%p) 0x%08lx %d\n", __func__,
>> + vb, vb->baddr, vb->bsize);
>> +
>> + imx_camera_wakeup(pcdev, vb, buf);
>>
>
> AFAIU, your flow looks as follows:
>
> 1. configure DMA, enable Start of Frame FIQ
> 2. <SoF FIQ> enable DMA, DMA IRQ, disable SoF FIQ
> 3. <DMA done IRQ> disable DMA, report completed buffer, goto 1
>
>
>> +
>> +out:
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcdev->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct videobuf_queue_ops imx_videobuf_ops = {
>> + .buf_setup = imx_videobuf_setup,
>> + .buf_prepare = imx_videobuf_prepare,
>> + .buf_queue = imx_videobuf_queue,
>> + .buf_release = imx_videobuf_release,
>>
>
> You use spaces before "=", but you're not aligning on "longest line plus
> one space," but on the next tab position... This is not critical, just
> seems strange to me.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void imx_camera_init_videobuf(struct videobuf_queue *q,
>> + struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
>> +
>> + videobuf_queue_dma_contig_init(q, &imx_videobuf_ops, pcdev->dev,
>> + &pcdev->lock,
>> + V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE,
>> + V4L2_FIELD_NONE,
>> + sizeof(struct imx_buffer), icd);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mclk_get_divisor(struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int mclk_10khz = pcdev->platform_mclk_10khz;
>> + unsigned long div;
>> + unsigned long lcdclk;
>> +
>> + lcdclk = clk_get_rate(pcdev->clk) / 10000;
>> +
>> + /* We verify platform_mclk_10khz != 0, so if anyone breaks it, here
>> + * they get a nice Oops */
>> + div = (lcdclk + 2 * mclk_10khz - 1) / (2 * mclk_10khz) - 1;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "System clock %lukHz, target freq %dkHz, "
>> + "divisor %lu\n", lcdclk * 10, mclk_10khz * 10, div);
>> +
>> + return div;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_camera_activate(struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imxcamera_platform_data *pdata = pcdev->pdata;
>> + unsigned int csicr1 = CSICR1_EN;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "Registered platform device at %p\n",
>> + pcdev);
>> +
>> + if (pdata && pdata->init) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Init gpios\n", __func__);
>> + pdata->init(pcdev->dev);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pdata && pdata->power) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Power on camera\n", __func__);
>> + pdata->power(pcdev->dev, 1);
>> + }
>>
>
> No, cameras should use .power and .reset from their struct
> soc_camera_link, please, drop this.
>
>
>> +
>> + clk_enable(pcdev->clk);
>> +
>> + /* enable CSI before doing anything else */
>> + __raw_writel(csicr1, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + csicr1 |= CSICR1_MCLKEN | CSICR1_FCC | CSICR1_GCLK_MODE;
>> + csicr1 |= CSICR1_MCLKDIV(mclk_get_divisor(pcdev));
>> + csicr1 |= CSICR1_RXFF_LEVEL(2); /* 16 words */
>> +
>> + __raw_writel(csicr1, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + if (pdata && pdata->reset) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Releasing camera reset\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + pdata->reset(pcdev->dev, 1);
>>
>
> Same here.
>
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_camera_deactivate(struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imxcamera_platform_data *board = pcdev->pdata;
>> +
>> + /* Disable all CSI interface */
>> + __raw_writel(0x00, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + clk_disable(pcdev->clk);
>> +
>> + if (board && board->reset) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Asserting camera reset\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + board->reset(pcdev->dev, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (board && board->power) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Power off camera\n", __func__);
>> + board->power(pcdev->dev, 0);
>> + }
>>
>
> These two too.
>
>
>> +
>> + if (board && board->exit) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Release gpios\n", __func__);
>> + board->exit(pcdev->dev);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The following two functions absolutely depend on the fact, that
>> + * there can be only one camera on i.MX camera sensor interface */
>> +static int imx_camera_add_device(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&camera_lock);
>> +
>> + if (pcdev->icd) {
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + goto ebusy;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(&icd->dev, "i.MX Camera driver attached to camera %d\n",
>> + icd->devnum);
>> +
>> + imx_camera_activate(pcdev);
>> + ret = icd->ops->init(icd);
>> +
>> + if (!ret)
>> + pcdev->icd = icd;
>> +
>> +ebusy:
>> + mutex_unlock(&camera_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void imx_camera_remove_device(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
>> + unsigned int csicr1;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(icd != pcdev->icd);
>> +
>> + /* disable interrupts */
>> + csicr1 = __raw_readl(pcdev->base + CSICR1) & ~CSI_IRQ_MASK;
>> + __raw_writel(csicr1, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + /* Stop DMA engine */
>> + imx_dma_disable(pcdev->dma_chan);
>> +
>> + dev_info(&icd->dev, "i.MX Camera driver detached from camera %d\n",
>> + icd->devnum);
>> +
>> + icd->ops->release(icd);
>> +
>> + imx_camera_deactivate(pcdev);
>> +
>> + pcdev->icd = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_set_bus_param(struct soc_camera_device *icd, __u32 pixfmt)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_host *ici =
>> + to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
>> + unsigned long camera_flags, common_flags;
>> + unsigned int csicr1;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + camera_flags = icd->ops->query_bus_param(icd);
>> +
>> + common_flags = soc_camera_bus_param_compatible(camera_flags,
>> + CSI_BUS_FLAGS);
>> + if (!common_flags)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!(common_flags & SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8)) {
>>
>
> I don't understand this. In your CSI_BUS_FLAGS you only support 8 bits. If
> the camera doesn't support it, you get a 0 back in common_flags and return
> -EINVAL above. So, this test seems redundant.
>
>
>> + dev_warn(&icd->dev, "Camera sensor doesn't support 8-bit bus "
>> + "width\n");
>> + /* set it so sensor set_bus_param could fail */
>> + common_flags |= SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8;
>> + }
>> +
>> + icd->buswidth = 8;
>> +
>> + /* Make choises, based on platform defaults */
>> + if ((common_flags & SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH) &&
>> + (common_flags & SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_LOW))
>> + common_flags &= ~SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH;
>> +
>> + if ((common_flags & SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING) &&
>> + (common_flags & SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING))
>> + common_flags &= ~SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING;
>>
>
> Hm, these are not "platform defaults," this is just your hard-coded
> preference.
>
>
>> +
>> + ret = icd->ops->set_bus_param(icd, common_flags);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + csicr1 = __raw_readl(pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + if (common_flags & SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING)
>> + csicr1 |= CSICR1_REDGE;
>> + if (common_flags & SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH)
>> + csicr1 |= CSICR1_SOF_POL;
>> +
>> + __raw_writel(csicr1, pcdev->base + CSICR1);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_set_fmt(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
>> + __u32 pixfmt, struct v4l2_rect *rect)
>> +{
>>
>
> You must set current_fmt here
>
>
>> + return icd->ops->set_fmt(icd, pixfmt, rect);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_try_fmt(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
>> + struct v4l2_format *f)
>> +{
>> + /* TODO: limit to imx hardware capabilities */
>> +
>> + /* limit to sensor capabilities */
>> + return icd->ops->try_fmt(icd, f);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_reqbufs(struct soc_camera_file *icf,
>> + struct v4l2_requestbuffers *p)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* This is for locking debugging only. I removed spinlocks and now I
>> + * check whether .prepare is ever called on a linked buffer, or whether
>> + * a dma IRQ can occur for an in-work or unlinked buffer. Until now
>> + * it hadn't triggered */
>> + for (i = 0; i < p->count; i++) {
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf = container_of(icf->vb_vidq.bufs[i],
>> + struct imx_buffer, vb);
>> + buf->inwork = 0;
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->vb.queue);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int imx_camera_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *pt)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_camera_file *icf = file->private_data;
>> + struct imx_buffer *buf;
>> +
>> + buf = list_entry(icf->vb_vidq.stream.next, struct imx_buffer,
>> + vb.stream);
>> +
>> + poll_wait(file, &buf->vb.done, pt);
>> +
>> + if (buf->vb.state == VIDEOBUF_DONE ||
>> + buf->vb.state == VIDEOBUF_ERROR)
>> + return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_querycap(struct soc_camera_host *ici,
>> + struct v4l2_capability *cap)
>> +{
>> + /* cap->name is set by the firendly caller:-> */
>>
>
> Typo: friendly
>
>
>> + strlcpy(cap->card, imx_cam_driver_description, sizeof(cap->card));
>> + cap->version = VERSION_CODE;
>> + cap->capabilities = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct soc_camera_host_ops imx_soc_camera_host_ops = {
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .add = imx_camera_add_device,
>> + .remove = imx_camera_remove_device,
>> + .set_fmt = imx_camera_set_fmt,
>> + .try_fmt = imx_camera_try_fmt,
>> + .init_videobuf = imx_camera_init_videobuf,
>> + .reqbufs = imx_camera_reqbufs,
>> + .poll = imx_camera_poll,
>> + .querycap = imx_camera_querycap,
>> + .set_bus_param = imx_camera_set_bus_param,
>>
>
> You are not implementing this against a current v4l tree. Please, rebase
> onto, e.g., linux-next. You will have to at least implement a .set_crop
> method too.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Should be allocated dynamically too, but we have only one. */
>> +static struct soc_camera_host imx_soc_camera_host = {
>> + .drv_name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> + .ops = &imx_soc_camera_host_ops,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct fiq_handler fh = {
>> + .name = "csi_sof"
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init imx_camera_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + struct pt_regs regs;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + unsigned int irq;
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (!res || !irq) {
>> + err = -ENODEV;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "csi_clk");
>>
>
> I think, the preferred method to get a clock now is to use NULL for its
> name, as long as there's only one clock attached to this device. However,
> it looks like mx1 doesn't implement clkdev yet, am I right?
>
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(clk);
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pcdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*pcdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pcdev) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate pcdev\n");
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, pcdev);
>> + pcdev->res = res;
>> + pcdev->clk = clk;
>> +
>> + pcdev->pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> +
>> + if (pcdev->pdata)
>> + pcdev->platform_mclk_10khz = pcdev->pdata->mclk_10khz;
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No platform data provided!\n");
>> +
>> + /* override if user entered mclk frequency as module param */
>> + if (mclk)
>> + pcdev->platform_mclk_10khz = mclk / 10000;
>> +
>> + if (!pcdev->platform_mclk_10khz) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> + "mclk_10khz == 0! Please, fix your platform data. "
>> + "Using default 20MHz\n");
>> + pcdev->platform_mclk_10khz = 2000;
>> + }
>> +
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcdev->capture);
>> + spin_lock_init(&pcdev->lock);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Request the regions.
>> + */
>> + if (!request_mem_region(res->start, res->end - res->start + 1,
>> + DRIVER_NAME)) {
>> + err = -EBUSY;
>> + goto exit_kfree;
>> + }
>> +
>> + base = ioremap(res->start, res->end - res->start + 1);
>>
>
> Use resource_size()
>
>
>> + if (!base) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto exit_release;
>> + }
>> + pcdev->irq = irq;
>> + pcdev->base = base;
>> + pcdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + /* request dma */
>> + pcdev->dma_chan = imx_dma_request_by_prio(DRIVER_NAME, DMA_PRIO_HIGH);
>> + if (pcdev->dma_chan < 0) {
>> + dev_err(pcdev->dev, "Can't request DMA for i.MX CSI\n");
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>>
>
> ENOMEM doesn't seem to fit well here, maybe EBUSY or something?
>
>
>> + goto exit_iounmap;
>> + }
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "got DMA channel %d\n", pcdev->dma_chan);
>> +
>> + imx_dma_setup_handlers(pcdev->dma_chan, imx_camera_dma_irq, NULL,
>> + pcdev);
>> +
>> + imx_dma_config_channel(pcdev->dma_chan, IMX_DMA_TYPE_FIFO,
>> + IMX_DMA_MEMSIZE_32, DMA_REQ_CSI_R, 0);
>> + /* burst length : 16 words = 64 bytes */
>> + imx_dma_config_burstlen(pcdev->dma_chan, 0);
>> +
>> + /* request irq */
>> + err = claim_fiq(&fh);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(pcdev->dev, "Camera interrupt register failed \n");
>> + goto exit_free_dma;
>> + }
>> +
>> + set_fiq_handler(&imx_camera_sof_fiq_start, &imx_camera_sof_fiq_end -
>> + &imx_camera_sof_fiq_start);
>> +
>> + regs.ARM_r8 = DMA_BASE + DMA_DIMR;
>> + regs.ARM_r9 = DMA_BASE + DMA_CCR(pcdev->dma_chan);
>> + regs.ARM_r10 = (long)pcdev->base + CSICR1;
>> + regs.ARM_fp = (long)pcdev->base + CSISR;
>> + regs.ARM_sp = 1 << pcdev->dma_chan;
>> + set_fiq_regs(®s);
>> +
>> + mxc_set_irq_fiq(irq, 1);
>> + enable_fiq(irq);
>> +
>> + imx_soc_camera_host.priv = pcdev;
>> + imx_soc_camera_host.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + imx_soc_camera_host.nr = pdev->id;
>> + err = soc_camera_host_register(&imx_soc_camera_host);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto exit_free_irq;
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "i.MX Camera driver loaded\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +exit_free_irq:
>> + disable_fiq(irq);
>> + mxc_set_irq_fiq(irq, 0);
>> + release_fiq(&fh);
>> +exit_free_dma:
>> + imx_dma_free(pcdev->dma_chan);
>> +exit_iounmap:
>> + iounmap(base);
>> +exit_release:
>> + release_mem_region(res->start, res->end - res->start + 1);
>> +exit_kfree:
>> + kfree(pcdev);
>> +exit:
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __exit imx_camera_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + struct resource *res;
>> +
>> + imx_dma_free(pcdev->dma_chan);
>> + disable_fiq(pcdev->irq);
>> + mxc_set_irq_fiq(pcdev->irq, 0);
>> + release_fiq(&fh);
>> +
>> + soc_camera_host_unregister(&imx_soc_camera_host);
>> +
>> + iounmap(pcdev->base);
>> +
>> + res = pcdev->res;
>> + release_mem_region(res->start, res->end - res->start + 1);
>> +
>> + kfree(pcdev);
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "i.MX Camera driver unloaded\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + struct imxcamera_platform_data *pdata = pcdev->pdata;
>> +
>> + if (pcdev->active)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + if (pdata && pdata->power) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Power off camera\n", __func__);
>> + pdata->power(pcdev->dev, 0);
>>
>
> No pdata->power please. See pxa_camera.c or other host drivers for suspend
> / resume handling and calling camera client power-management hooks.
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int imx_camera_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_camera_dev *pcdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + struct imxcamera_platform_data *pdata = pcdev->pdata;
>> +
>> + if (pdata && pdata->power) {
>> + dev_dbg(pcdev->dev, "%s: Power on camera\n", __func__);
>> + pdata->power(pcdev->dev, 1);
>>
>
> Same here
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver imx_camera_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> + },
>> + .remove = __exit_p(imx_camera_remove),
>> + .suspend = imx_camera_suspend,
>> + .resume = imx_camera_resume,
>>
>
> Any reason to not be using .suspend and .resume from struct
> soc_camera_host_ops?
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init imx_camera_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_probe(&imx_camera_driver, imx_camera_probe);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit imx_camera_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_unregister(&imx_camera_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(imx_camera_init);
>> +module_exit(imx_camera_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("i.MX SoC Camera Host driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRIVER_NAME);
>> +
>> +module_param(mclk, int, 0);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mclk, "MCLK value in Hz");
>>
>
> Hm, do you really think anyone needs mclk as a parameter?
>
>
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.29.orig/drivers/media/video/Kconfig
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/Kconfig
>> @@ -929,4 +929,13 @@ config USB_S2255
>>
>> endif # V4L_USB_DRIVERS
>>
>> +config VIDEO_IMX
>> + tristate "i.MX CMOS Sensor Interface driver"
>> + depends on VIDEO_DEV && ARCH_MX1
>> + select FIQ
>> + select SOC_CAMERA
>> + select VIDEOBUF_DMA_CONTIG
>>
>
> It has been decided they have to depend on soc_camera, e.g.,
>
> depends on VIDEO_DEV && SOC_CAMERA && HAS_DMA && HAVE_CLK
> select VIDEOBUF_DMA_CONTIG
>
>
>> + ---help---
>> + This is a v4l2 driver for the i.MX CMOS Sensor Interface
>> +
>> endif # VIDEO_CAPTURE_DRIVERS
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.29.orig/drivers/media/video/Makefile
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/drivers/media/video/Makefile
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CX18) += cx18/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VIVI) += vivi.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CX23885) += cx23885/
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX) += imx_camera.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_PXA27x) += pxa_camera.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_SH_MOBILE_CEU) += sh_mobile_ceu_camera.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_OMAP2) += omap2cam.o
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.29.orig/arch/arm/mach-mx1/Makefile
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/Makefile
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>
>> # Object file lists.
>>
>> -obj-y += generic.o clock.o devices.o
>> +obj-y += generic.o clock.o devices.o ksym_mx1.o
>>
>> # Power management
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += pm.o
>> @@ -13,5 +13,10 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG),y)
>> CFLAGS_pm.o += -DDEBUG
>> endif
>>
>> +# Support for CMOS sensor interface
>> +ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX
>> +obj-y += imx_camera_fiq.o
>> +endif
>> +
>> # Specific board support
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX1ADS) += mx1ads.o
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.29.orig/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h
>> @@ -19,4 +19,12 @@
>> #define PHYS_OFFSET UL(0x80000000)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX) || defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_MODULE)
>> +/*
>> + * Increase size of DMA-consistent memory region.
>> + * This is required for i.MX camera driver to capture at least four VGA frames.
>> + */
>> +#define CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE SZ_8M
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX */
>> +
>> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MXC_MEMORY_H__ */
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/camera.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/camera.h
>>
>
> No, you have to select a more specific name for it. There is already an
> mx3_camera.h there.
>
>
>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> +/*
>> + * camera.h - i.MX camera driver header file
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008, Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>> + *
>> + * Based on PXA camera.h file:
>> + * Copyright (C) 2003, Intel Corporation
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski <kernel@pengutronix.de>
>> + *
>> + * This file is released under the GPLv2
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_
>> +#define __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_
>> +
>> +extern unsigned char imx_camera_sof_fiq_start, imx_camera_sof_fiq_end;
>> +
>> +struct imxcamera_platform_data {
>> + int (*init)(struct device *);
>> + int (*exit)(struct device *);
>> + int (*power)(struct device *, int);
>> + int (*reset)(struct device *, int);
>>
>
> Just remove power and reset here. Remember, you might have more than one
> camera attached, even if only one of them can be active at any given time.
>
>
>> +
>> + unsigned long mclk_10khz;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_ */
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/imx_camera_fiq.S
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/imx_camera_fiq.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>> + *
>> + * Based on linux/arch/arm/lib/floppydma.S
>> + * Copyright (C) 1995, 1996 Russell King
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>
>
> Here you have GPL v2 only
>
>
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
>> +#include <asm/assembler.h>
>> +
>> + .text
>> + .global imx_camera_sof_fiq_end
>> + .global imx_camera_sof_fiq_start
>> +imx_camera_sof_fiq_start:
>> + @ enable dma
>> + ldr r12, [r9]
>> + orr r12, r12, #0x00000001
>> + str r12, [r9]
>> + @ unmask DMA interrupt
>> + ldr r12, [r8]
>> + bic r12, r12, r13
>> + str r12, [r8]
>> + @ disable SOF interrupt
>> + ldr r12, [r10]
>> + bic r12, r12, #0x00010000
>> + str r12, [r10]
>> + @ clear SOF flag
>> + mov r12, #0x00010000
>> + str r12, [r11]
>> + @ return from FIQ
>> + subs pc, lr, #4
>> +imx_camera_sof_fiq_end:
>> Index: linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/ksym_mx1.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ linux-2.6.29/arch/arm/mach-mx1/ksym_mx1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Exported ksyms of ARCH_MX1
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008, Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
>> + *
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>
>
> Here >= 2 again
>
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX) || defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_MODULE)
>> +#include <mach/camera.h>
>> +
>> +/* IMX camera FIQ handler */
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(imx_camera_sof_fiq_start);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(imx_camera_sof_fiq_end);
>> +#endif
>>
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49C89F00.1020402@gmail.com>
2009-03-26 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] CSI camera interface driver for MX1 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-03-26 19:19 ` Darius Augulis [this message]
2009-03-26 20:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-26 20:19 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-03-26 21:31 ` Dave Strauss
2009-03-26 21:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-26 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-03-27 7:33 ` Holger Schurig
2009-03-27 8:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-03-27 9:37 ` Darius Augulis
2009-03-27 10:34 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-27 10:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-27 13:39 ` Darius Augulis
2009-03-27 16:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-27 15:18 ` Darius Augulis
2009-03-27 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-03-27 15:55 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CBD53C.6060700@gmail.com \
--to=augulis.darius@gmail.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox