From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.218.169]:34364 "EHLO mail-bw0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754618AbZC0Jjf (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:39:35 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so907390bwz.37 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49CC9E53.9070805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:37:23 +0200 From: Darius Augulis MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, Linux Media Mailing List , Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] CSI camera interface driver for MX1 References: <49C89F00.1020402@gmail.com> <49CBD53C.6060700@gmail.com> <20090326170910.6926d8de@pedra.chehab.org> In-Reply-To: <20090326170910.6926d8de@pedra.chehab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Darius, > > Please always base your patches against the last v4l-dvb tree or linux-next. > This is specially important those days, where v4l core is suffering several > changes. Hi, could you please advice which v4l-dvb Git repository I should pull from? Because git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/devel.git does not have any new stuff now. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.git is marked as "unstable" for testing purposes. What is better to base my patches on? Darius.