From: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Add camera (CSI) driver for MX1
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:30:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D60162.2020907@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090403122939.GT23731@pengutronix.de>
Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:15:34PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Darius Augulis wrote:
>>
>>> From: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
>> Ok, I'll just swap these two Sob's to reflect the processing chain, add a
>> description like
>>
>> Add support for CMOS Sensor Interface on i.MX1 and i.MXL SoCs.
>>
>> and fix a couple of trivial conflicts, which probably appear, because you
>> based your patches on an MXC tree, and not on current linux-next.
>> Wondering, if it still will work then... At least it compiles. BTW, should
>> it really also work with IMX? Then you might want to change this
>>
>> depends on VIDEO_DEV && ARCH_MX1 && SOC_CAMERA
>>
>> to
>>
>> depends on VIDEO_DEV && (ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_IMX) && SOC_CAMERA
>
> This shouldn't be necessary. ARCH_IMX does not have the platform part to
> make use of this driver and will never get it.
>
>> but you can do this later, maybe, when you actually get a chance to test
>> it on IMX (if you haven't done so yet).
>>
>> Sascha, we need your ack for the ARM part.
>
> I'm OK with this driver: I have never worked with FIQs though so I can't
> say much to it.
At least I can confirm it worked well with 2.6.28.5 kernel version.
>
> Sascha
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-03 11:30 [PATCH V4] Add camera (CSI) driver for MX1 Darius Augulis
2009-04-03 11:46 ` Darius Augulis
2009-04-03 12:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-04-03 12:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-04-03 12:30 ` Darius Augulis [this message]
2009-04-03 12:41 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-04-03 12:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-04-03 12:52 ` Darius Augulis
2009-04-03 13:01 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D60162.2020907@gmail.com \
--to=augulis.darius@gmail.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox