From: CityK <cityk@rogers.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>,
LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:02:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DC13D3.4080201@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407112715.6caf2e89@hyperion.delvare>
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:10:36 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, den 06.04.2009, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jean Delvare:
>>
>>> Anyone out there with a MSI TV@nywhere Plus that could help with
>>> testing?
>>>
>> Here is a link to one of the initial reports by Henry, others are close
>> to it.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=113324147429459&w=2
>>
>> There are two different variants of that MSI card, but that undocumented
>> KS003 chip is the same on them.
>>
>
> Great, thanks for the pointer. If I understand correctly, the KS003
> has a state machine flow which causes the chip to stop answering when
> an invalid address is used on the bus and start answering again when a
> valid address other than his own is used. As the old i2c model relied a
> lot on probing, I am not surprised that this was a problem in the past.
> But with the new model, probes should become infrequent, so I suspect
> that the workaround may no longer be needed... except when i2c_scan=1
> is used.
>
> I'd rather keep the workaround in place for the time being, and only
> once the ir-kbd-i2c changes have settled, try to remove it if someone
> really cares.
Regarding the KS003 (& KS007; the other "mystery" chip):
Upon further investigation of some info from a post from last year
(http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-January/022634.html),
it appears that these (assuming that they are the same IC across the
various MSI, Leadtek & KWorld cards; and I believe that to be true) are
the "AT8PS54/S56" chip from "Feeling Technology" ... the datasheet for
that part is available through a google search .... probing further (as
I had never heard of FT before and so I looked them up), it looks like
FT renamed and/or upgraded the chip to the "FM8PS54/S56" ... the near
identical datasheet for that second version is also available:
http://www.feeling-tech.com.tw/km-master/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=M1-05&Category=100018
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-04 12:24 [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] cx18: Fix the handling of i2c bus registration error Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:46 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 14:23 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 22:30 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-07 9:31 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-07 12:14 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Don't use i2c_client.name for our own needs Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 13:42 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 16:05 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-04 22:24 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 22:39 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 22:51 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 1:50 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 13:08 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:13 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 15:51 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-04 23:05 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 23:29 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-05 14:18 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:33 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-05 20:19 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 3:48 ` Trent Piepho
2009-04-06 3:53 ` pvrusb2 IR changes coming [was: [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model] Mike Isely
2009-04-05 5:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Hans Verkuil
2009-04-05 9:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 12:44 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 13:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 14:05 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 19:35 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 9:04 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 12:06 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 14:37 ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 16:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 16:58 ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 17:39 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 18:31 ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 18:58 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 20:22 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 21:22 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-05 22:00 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 22:21 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06 1:49 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06 1:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-06 2:52 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06 3:26 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06 4:44 ` Trent Piepho
2009-04-06 12:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-06 8:40 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 21:10 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-07 9:27 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-08 3:02 ` CityK [this message]
2009-04-08 11:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-12 17:37 ` CityK
2009-04-12 23:35 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-09 19:15 ` Oldrich Jedlicka
2009-04-17 13:42 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 13:13 ` Jarod Wilson
2009-04-05 18:48 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06 10:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-04 12:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Use initialization data Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] saa7134: Simplify handling of IR on MSI TV@nywhere Plus Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] saa7134: Simplify handling of IR on AVerMedia Cardbus Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 15:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model Mike Isely
2009-04-05 10:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 14:40 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:40 ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06 0:22 ` Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model) Andy Walls
2009-04-06 8:54 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 11:56 ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 11:11 ` Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-06 5:35 [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Uri Shkolnik
2009-04-06 10:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DC13D3.4080201@rogers.com \
--to=cityk@rogers.com \
--cc=hermann-pitton@arcor.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox