public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: CityK <cityk@rogers.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>,
	LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:02:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DC13D3.4080201@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407112715.6caf2e89@hyperion.delvare>

Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:10:36 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
>   
>> Am Montag, den 06.04.2009, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jean Delvare:
>>     
>>> Anyone out there with a MSI TV@nywhere Plus that could help with
>>> testing?
>>>       
>> Here is a link to one of the initial reports by Henry, others are close
>> to it.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=113324147429459&w=2
>>
>> There are two different variants of that MSI card, but that undocumented
>> KS003 chip is the same on them.
>>     
>
> Great, thanks for the pointer. If I understand correctly, the KS003
> has a state machine flow which causes the chip to stop answering when
> an invalid address is used on the bus and start answering again when a
> valid address other than his own is used. As the old i2c model relied a
> lot on probing, I am not surprised that this was a problem in the past.
> But with the new model, probes should become infrequent, so I suspect
> that the workaround may no longer be needed... except when i2c_scan=1
> is used.
>
> I'd rather keep the workaround in place for the time being, and only
> once the ir-kbd-i2c changes have settled, try to remove it if someone
> really cares.

Regarding the KS003 (& KS007; the other "mystery" chip):

Upon further investigation of some info from a post from last year
(http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-January/022634.html),
it appears that these (assuming that they are the same IC across the
various MSI, Leadtek & KWorld cards; and I believe that to be true) are
the "AT8PS54/S56" chip from "Feeling Technology" ... the datasheet for
that part is available through a google search .... probing further (as
I had never heard of FT before and so I looked them up), it looks like
FT renamed and/or upgraded the chip to the "FM8PS54/S56" ... the near
identical datasheet for that second version is also available:
http://www.feeling-tech.com.tw/km-master/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=M1-05&Category=100018


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-08  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-04 12:24 [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] cx18: Fix the handling of i2c bus registration error Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:46   ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 14:23     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 22:30       ` Andy Walls
2009-04-07  9:31     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-07 12:14       ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Don't use i2c_client.name for our own needs Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 13:42   ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 16:05     ` Mike Isely
2009-04-04 22:24       ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 22:39         ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 22:51     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05  1:50       ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 13:08         ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:13           ` Andy Walls
2009-04-04 15:51   ` Mike Isely
2009-04-04 23:05     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 23:29       ` Mike Isely
2009-04-05 14:18         ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:33           ` Mike Isely
2009-04-05 20:19             ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06  3:48               ` Trent Piepho
2009-04-06  3:53             ` pvrusb2 IR changes coming [was: [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model] Mike Isely
2009-04-05  5:46       ` [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Hans Verkuil
2009-04-05  9:14         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 12:44           ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 13:08             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 14:05         ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 19:35           ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06  9:04             ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 12:06               ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 14:37         ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 16:37           ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 16:58             ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 17:39           ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 18:31             ` Janne Grunau
2009-04-05 18:58               ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 20:22                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 21:22                   ` hermann pitton
2009-04-05 22:00                     ` Andy Walls
2009-04-05 22:21                       ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06  1:49                       ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06  1:51                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-06  2:52                         ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06  3:26                           ` hermann pitton
2009-04-06  4:44                           ` Trent Piepho
2009-04-06 12:31                           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-06  8:40                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 21:10                       ` hermann pitton
2009-04-07  9:27                         ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-08  3:02                           ` CityK [this message]
2009-04-08 11:31                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-12 17:37                               ` CityK
2009-04-12 23:35                                 ` hermann pitton
2009-04-09 19:15                         ` Oldrich Jedlicka
2009-04-17 13:42                           ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 13:13               ` Jarod Wilson
2009-04-05 18:48         ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06 10:54           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-04 12:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Use initialization data Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] saa7134: Simplify handling of IR on MSI TV@nywhere Plus Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] saa7134: Simplify handling of IR on AVerMedia Cardbus Jean Delvare
2009-04-04 15:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model Mike Isely
2009-04-05 10:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-05 14:40   ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-05 18:40     ` Mike Isely
2009-04-06  0:22     ` Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model) Andy Walls
2009-04-06  8:54       ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-06 11:56         ` Andy Walls
2009-04-06 11:11           ` Jean Delvare
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-06  5:35 [PATCH 3/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model Uri Shkolnik
2009-04-06 10:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DC13D3.4080201@rogers.com \
    --to=cityk@rogers.com \
    --cc=hermann-pitton@arcor.de \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox