From: "Erik Andrén" <erik.andren@gmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>,
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@redhat.com>,
SPCA50x Linux Device Driver Development
<spca50x-devs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release!
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E9E652.5070706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E9B989.70602@redhat.com>
Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
> On 04/17/2009 09:27 PM, Erik Andrén wrote:
>>
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/16/2009 10:46 PM, Adam Baker wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 16 Apr 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On 04/16/2009 12:26 AM, Adam Baker wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday 15 Apr 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>>> Currently only whitebalancing is enabled and only on Pixarts (pac)
>>>>>>> webcams (which benefit tremendously from this). To test this with
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> webcams (after instaling this release) do:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> export LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS=15
>>>>>>> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l2convert.so v4l2ucp&
>>>>>> Strangely while those instructions give me a whitebalance control
>>>>>> for the
>>>>>> sq905 based camera I can't get it to appear for a pac207 based camera
>>>>>> regardless of whether LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS is set.
>>>>> Thats weird, there is a small bug in the handling of pac207
>>>>> cams with usb id 093a:2476 causing libv4l to not automatically
>>>>> enable whitebalancing (and the control) for cams with that id,
>>>>> but if you have LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS set (exported!) both
>>>>> when loading v4l2ucp (you must preload v4l2convert.so!) and
>>>>> when loading your viewer, then it should work.
>>>>>
>>>> I've tested it by plugging in the sq905 camera, verifying the
>>>> whitebablance
>>>> control is present and working, unplugging the sq905 and plugging in
>>>> the
>>>> pac207 and using up arrow to restart v4l2ucp and svv so I think I've
>>>> eliminated most finger trouble possibilities. The pac207 is id
>>>> 093a:2460 so
>>>> not the problem id. I'll have to investigate more thoroughly later.
>>>>
>>> Does the pac207 perhaps have a / in its "card" string (see v4l-info
>>> output) ?
>>> if so try out this patch:
>>> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~hgoede/libv4l/rev/1e08d865690a
>>>
>>
>> I have the same issue as Adam when trying to test this with my
>> gspca_stv06xx based Quickcam Web camera i. e no whitebalancing
>> controls show up. I'm attaching a dump which logs all available
>> pixformats and v4l2ctrls showing that libv4l is properly loaded.
>> (And yes, LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS is exported and set to 15).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Erik
>>
>
> Ah, you are using v4l2-ctl, not v4l2ucp, and that uses
> V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_NEXT_CTRL
> control enumeration. My code doesn't handle V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_NEXT_CTRL
> (which is
> a bug). I'm not sure when I'll have time to fix this. Patches welcome,
> or in
> the mean time use v4l2ucp to play with the controls.
>
Actually, I've tried to use both without finding the controls.
I've only tried with v4l2ucp v. 1.2. Is 1.3 necessary?
Best regards,
Erik
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-18 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 12:36 libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release! Hans de Goede
2009-04-15 22:26 ` Adam Baker
2009-04-15 23:02 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 20:46 ` Adam Baker
2009-04-17 8:54 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-17 19:27 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-18 11:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-18 14:40 ` Erik Andrén [this message]
2009-04-19 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-19 19:20 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-19 19:49 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-20 4:43 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-20 7:43 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-20 7:54 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-18 19:44 ` Adam Baker
2009-04-18 22:45 ` [PATCH][libv4l] Support V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_NEXT_CTRL for fake controls Adam Baker
2009-05-17 13:49 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-17 22:13 ` libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release! Adam Baker
2009-04-18 11:27 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 6:16 ` Gilles Gigan
2009-04-16 9:25 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 9:38 ` Gilles Gigan
2009-04-17 19:31 ` Erik Andrén
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E9E652.5070706@gmail.com \
--to=erik.andren@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=spca50x-devs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox