public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lister <foceni@gmail.com>
To: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>
Cc: Goga777 <goga777@bk.ru>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Most stable DVB-S2 PCI Card?
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:03:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A17C9F7.8050800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a297b360905222337r1b65bbe7n65578d1991348b9@mail.gmail.com>

Manu Abraham wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM, David Lister <foceni@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> This point is moot in the first place, mate. Especially in USA (original
>> poster), where it'll take twice the time to reach those rates on DVB-S2.
>> All current 45 MS/s transponders are QPSK, at least as far as I can
>> tell. Even if that "technology preview" 8PSK transponder of yours
>> existed (somewhere above Asia), it's hardly a reason to buy
>> Linux-unstable cards in EU or USA.
>>     
> Have you tried the card, to state that it is unstable ? I would like
> to know the basis
> for your comments to state that it is unstable.
>   

I was not talking specifically about TT-1600, but with your drivers
being relatively young, not in wide use, and you being the only
developer (right?), it's common sense to assume that they are not as
stable as e.g. cx88. Also considering the fact that none of these
drivers even report signal stats properly. Then, of course, there's my
recent experience with your SkyStar HD2 driver. :) You have to
understand that me, in this case just a common user, do not wish to
invest into a product with an unfinished driver. If it was for me, I
wouldn't really care, but with the whole family using the HTPC...

I didn't want to write a long mail, but here goes:

The TechnoTrend company, as of Februay 2009, doesn't exists any more.
*It is bankrupt*. First, its owner Novabase sold as many of its shares
as it could in 2007, in hope that the proceeds would allow TechnoTrend
to get back on track. No such luck. A few months back this year, the
company was finally dumped and sold as a whole to some German telco
company in the Kathrein Group for liquidation, because of the tremendous
drop in it's market value and forthcoming bankruptcy. This might also be
of some interest to prospective buyers of it's former products. :) I
don't want to search for all the press releases, but you can verify this
claim here:
http://www.euronext.com/fic/000/044/480/444806.pdf

Nevertheless, I tried to get the data-sheet for this dead product from
their closed down & discontinued sites. Google cache is a great thing, I
managed to find TechnoTrend's S2-1600 data-sheet PDF:
http://www.pt.technotrend.com/Dokumente/87/Manuals_PC/specs_eng/TechSpec_S2-1600_engl.pdf

As much as I'd like to believe your "S2-1600 supports 63 MS/s", I cannot
ignore the fact that the manufacturer disagrees with you:
DVB-S: 2 - 45 MS/s
DVB-S2: 10 - 30 MS/s

Pretty standard specs, if you ask me. Obviously, you must have proven
the *manufacturer* wrong by verifying your claim in practice. I just
wonder how you did it, when no existing DVB-S2 transponder uses rates
over 30 MS/s. Wasn't it perhaps just some "dry" testing without any
signal, like gradually raising the HW parameters and sniffing for smoke? :)

That's all I had to say. I know that the TT bankruptcy thing is
irrelevant in a technical discussion, but it is important nonetheless. I
wouldn't recommend TT products, nor SkyStar HD2, which is kinda infamous
on some EU sat forums (not only in connection with Linux).


See you around,
-- 
Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-23 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-22 17:32 [linux-dvb] Most stable DVB-S2 PCI Card? Niels Wagenaar
2009-05-22 17:48 ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-22 19:42   ` Goga777
2009-05-22 20:25     ` Manu Abraham
     [not found]       ` <4A171985.3090205@gmail.com>
2009-05-22 21:38         ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-23  5:51           ` David Lister
2009-05-23  6:37             ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-23 10:03               ` David Lister [this message]
2009-05-23 10:39                 ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-23 13:30                   ` David Lister
     [not found]                   ` <4A17F4E9.7090503@gmail.com>
2009-05-23 13:39                     ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-23 16:01                 ` Andreas Regel
2009-05-23 18:16                   ` David Lister
2009-05-23 18:45                     ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-23 20:30                       ` David Lister
2009-05-24  6:45                         ` VDR User
2009-05-25  2:36             ` Re : " Manu
2009-05-25  5:32               ` David Lister
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 18:02 Niels Wagenaar
2009-05-22 18:12 ` Manu Abraham
2009-05-22 17:23 Bob Ingraham
2009-05-22 17:28 ` [linux-dvb] " Another Sillyname
2009-05-22 17:35 ` Manu Abraham
2009-11-13  1:17   ` Jonas Kvinge
2009-11-13  9:43     ` rulet1
2009-11-13 18:02     ` Magnus Hörlin
2009-11-13 20:11       ` Jonas Kvinge
2009-11-13 20:28         ` hermann pitton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A17C9F7.8050800@gmail.com \
    --to=foceni@gmail.com \
    --cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
    --cc=goga777@bk.ru \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox