From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]:53672 "EHLO smtp5-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751888AbZEYV3Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 17:29:24 -0400 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4CCD48127 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 23:29:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (bob75-6-82-238-74-76.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.74.76]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F64CD48002 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 23:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A1B0D0C.7040707@free.fr> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 23:26:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nicolas_L=E9veill=E9?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Strange PCI IDs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, While discovering the bttv code (I'd like to add support to a yet unsupported bttv derivative, the PMS PDI Deluxe) I found a strange commit: changeset: 10944:6b90215088f0 user: Mauro Carvalho Chehab date: Wed Mar 11 08:18:53 2009 -0300 summary: Conceptronic CTVFMI2 PCI Id within: linux/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-cards.c { 0x109e036e, BTTV_BOARD_CONCEPTRONIC_CTVFMI2, "Conceptronic CTVFMi v2"}, Does the above work at all for autodetecting this card? The PCI ID looks suspiciously like a generic PCI ID, especially considering that: 109e : vendor id for "Brooktree Corporation" 036e : device id for "Bt878 Video Capture" So I immediately was surprised to see the above PCI ID constant. It does not appear it would cause any problem since the vendor and device ids are reversed anyway, however is this really correct? Shouldn't there be a comment about it? Cheers, Nicolas Léveillé