From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Erik de Castro Lopo <erik@bcode.com>
Cc: "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPL code for Omnivision USB video camera available.
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:00:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A36B654.7020306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615110152.4c577be7.erik@bcode.com>
On 06/15/2009 03:01 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:12:10 +1000
> Hans de Goede<hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Getting ovfx2 support into the mainline kernel sounds like a good idea!
>>
>> I'm not such a big fan of merging the driver as is though, as it does
>> its own buffer management (and ioctl handling, usb interrupt handling,
>> locking, etc).
>
> I understand completely.
>
Good!
>> For adding the ovfx2 driver, you could start by copying ov519.c, which
>> already has setup and control code fro most ov sensors and then rewrite
>> the bridge part to be ovfx2 code, then later we can try to move the
>> sensor code to a shared c file for the ov519 and ovfx2 driver, depending
>> on how much you needed to change the sensor code. Or you could add
>> support for the ovfx2 to the ov519 driver.
>>
>> Note I've recently being doing quite a bit of work on the ov519 driver,
>> adding support for the ov511 and ov518 and adding more controls. I'll
>> make a mercurial tree available with my latest code in it asap.
>
> Ok, there's the rub. I am simply way too busy at the moment to push this
> through myself.
>
> I was hoping I could contract someone to take the existing code and
> massage it into shape ready for merging. I would prefer it if that
> someone was already a V4L hacker, but if I can't find anyone with
> pre-existing V4L experience I'll find someone local with general
> Linux kernel/driver experience.
>
Well I can't offer you contracting, as I simply do not have the spare time
to make such promises, but as any good hacker: "will work for hardware"
on a I'll do my best but no promises made basis.
I'm actually spending quite a bit of time lately on v4l stuff again,
and I'm sure willing to spend some time on this. I can even promise you
I'll bump it to the top of the list of my v4l projects.
For a general idea how deep I'm involved in v4l webcam support see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterWebcamSupport
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 1:02 GPL code for Omnivision USB video camera available Erik de Castro Lopo
2009-06-12 6:51 ` Hans de Goede
2009-06-13 0:45 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2009-06-13 8:12 ` Hans de Goede
2009-06-15 1:01 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2009-06-15 21:00 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2009-06-14 9:51 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A36B654.7020306@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=erik@bcode.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox