From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33617 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1754987AbZFYPmF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:42:05 -0400
Message-ID: <4A439A81.6000806@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:40:49 +0200
From: wk <handygewinnspiel@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why is the old DVB ML still alive?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Why is the old dvb (linux-dvb) mailing list still alive?

One of the arguments migrating all dvb related stuff to this combined ml 
was to reduce overhead.
But in fact some information might be lost now, since not everybody will 
look at both ML's.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to close the old ml now / is this foreseen at 
all?

--Winfried