From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:38543 "EHLO fmmailgate03.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751568AbZHANeW (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:34:22 -0400 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8C41094EF86 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:34:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.228.207.67] (helo=[172.16.99.2]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1MXEj8-0002O4-00 for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:34:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4A74445D.40900@magic.ms> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:34:21 +0200 From: emagick@magic.ms MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch for stack/DMA problems in Cinergy T2 drivers (2) References: <4A735330.1000406@magic.ms> <20090731214046.GA28139@linuxtv.org> In-Reply-To: <20090731214046.GA28139@linuxtv.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > There is a fair amount of code duplication. A better aproach would > be to allocate buffers once in cinergyt2_fe_attach() > (add them to struct cinergyt2_fe_state). That's how it was done in the old cinergyT2 driver. Does the code in DVB frontend code assure that the frontend ops are entered by only one thread at a time? -emagick