From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7A0W4C1030812 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:32:04 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.71]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7A0VnQJ005149 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:31:50 -0400 Received: from c-24-63-249-206.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([24.63.249.206] helo=homer.edgehp.net) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1MaInl-000LMl-Ly for video4linux-list@redhat.com; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:31:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.154.40] (anastasia.edgehp.net [192.168.154.40]) by homer.edgehp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2391E3AAF2 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:56:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A7F3813.3050101@edgehp.net> Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:56:51 -0400 From: Dale Pontius MIME-Version: 1.0 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Status of cx18 drivers, mercurial vs in-kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: I've been running the cx18 drivers out of mercurial since getting my HVR-1600 running, almost a year ago. As I see things, the driver is pretty mature now, and in fact I see commits for cx18 in 2.6.31 that are some of the last I saw going into the "regular" driver in mercurial. (I'm not counting the diagnostic work that has been going on in the last month or two, for one particular user.) Is it reasonable to go with the in-kernel cx18 driver when 2.6.31 goes stable, or is there still significant value with sticking with mercurial? Dale Pontius -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list