From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:59753 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758395AbZIOTOh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4AAFE78B.6060606@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:14:19 +0200 From: Marcin Slusarz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Mohr CC: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Luca Risolia , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, LKML , jirislaby@gmail.com Subject: Re: V4L2 drivers: potentially dangerous and inefficient msecs_to_jiffies() calculation References: <20090914210741.GA16799@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20090914210741.GA16799@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andreas Mohr pisze: > Hi all, > > ./drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c > , > ./drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c > and > ./drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c > do > cam->module_param.frame_timeout * > 1000 * msecs_to_jiffies(1) ); > multiple times each. > What they should do instead is > frame_timeout * msecs_to_jiffies(1000), I'd think. Or better: frame_timeout * HZ Marcin