From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33737 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbZIQSC6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:02:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4AB27AA7.20307@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:06:31 +0200 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent Pinchart CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus , Cohen David Abraham , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koskip=E4=E4?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Antti_Jussi_Petteri?= , "Zutshi Vimarsh (Nokia-D-MSW/Helsinki)" , stefan.kost@nokia.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Global video buffers pool References: <200909161746.39754.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <200909161746.39754.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On 09/16/2009 05:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I didn't want to miss this year's pretty flourishing RFC season, so here's > another one about a global video buffers pool. > > All comments are welcome, but please don't trash this proposal too fast. It's > a first shot at real problems encountered in real situations with real > hardware (namely high resolution still image capture on OMAP3). It's far from > perfect, and I'm open to completely different solutions if someone thinks of > one. > Sound like a reasonable and usefull proposal to me. Not much to add other then that. Regards, Hans