From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:35452 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753951AbZIRQ0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:26:38 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so829085fxm.37 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB3B4E3.3080806@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:27:15 +1000 From: Jed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Hw capabilities of the HVR-2200 References: <4AAF568D.1070308@gmail.com> <4AB3B454.6090808@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AB3B454.6090808@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> **a repost because of earlier issues in getting emails to the list** >> >> Hi Kernellabs or anyone involved with driver development of the >> HVR-2200... >> >> I know this is a loooong way down the priority list of features to be >> added, if ever! >> But I'm wanting to know if the *possibility* is there 'hardware-wise' >> for the following: >> >> 1) h.263/mpeg4/VC-1/DivX/Xvid hardware encode of A/V-in >> 2) Component input for the A/V-in >> 3) Hw encode bypass for A/V-in >> 4) Is Hw encode purely for A/V-in? (hauppauge's site suggests >> otherwise but it may be a typo) >> 5) If not then questions 1) & 3) also apply to RF-in! >> >> Here are the reference cards spec sheets again: >> http://www.picamatic.com/view/5094357_75016126_P1/ >> http://www.picamatic.com/view/5094364_75016126_P2/ >> http://www.picamatic.com/view/5094375_75016207_P1/ >> http://www.picamatic.com/view/5094373_75016207_P2/ >> >> I would be proactive in providing feed-back (as needed) for the dev. >> of such features. >> >> Most Sincerely, >> Jed >> >> > [Follow-up post] *Delivery issues resolved, although there's still > delays of 7hrs or more being investigated with postmasters* > > Attention Kernellabs devs, > I've deliberately delayed these two posts as Steve mentioned he wouldn't > have time to respond for at least 1wk. > > It's now been almost two weeks, do you think you might have 5-minutes to > spare now? > I realise you might not "know" the answer to some of my questions > yet!... :-) > > All the best, > Jed > woops sorry, double post, well that was certainly very quick! No more issues with delays apparent...