From: "Németh Márton" <nm127@freemail.hu>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS does not handle NULL pointer correctly
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:22:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B212E5A.7080502@freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912101214.22154.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:58:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 15:53:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:52:28 -0300
>>>
>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> escreveu:
>>>> Em Mon, 25 May 2009 11:16:34 -0300
>>>>
>>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> escreveu:
>>>>> Em Mon, 25 May 2009 13:17:02 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>> Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@skynet.be> escreveu:
>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Márton Németh found an integer overflow bug in the extended control
>>>>>> ioctl handling code. This affects both video_usercopy and
>>>>>> video_ioctl2. See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13357
>>>>>> for a detailed description of the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Restricting v4l2_ext_controls::count to values smaller than
>>>>>> KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(struct v4l2_ext_control) should be
>>>>>> enough, but we might want to restrict the value even further. I'd
>>>>>> like opinions on this.
>>>>> Seems fine to my eyes, but being so close to kmalloc size doesn't
>>>>> seem to be a good idea. It seems better to choose an arbitrary size
>>>>> big enough to handle all current needs.
>>>> I'll apply the current version, but I still think we should restrict it
>>>> to a lower value.
>>> Hmm... SOB is missing. Márton and Laurent, could you please sign it
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@skynet.be>
>
> Márton reminded me that the patch has still not been applied.
>
> Please replace the above SOB line with
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-10 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-25 11:17 [RFC,PATCH] VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS does not handle NULL pointer correctly Laurent Pinchart
2009-05-25 14:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-10 13:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-10 13:53 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Németh Márton
2009-06-10 21:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-12-10 11:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-12-10 17:22 ` Németh Márton [this message]
2009-05-25 19:22 ` Trent Piepho
2009-05-27 15:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-05-28 6:44 ` Németh Márton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-27 15:26 [RFC, PATCH] " Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B212E5A.7080502@freemail.hu \
--to=nm127@freemail.hu \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox