public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Raasch <ryan.raasch@gmail.com>
To: Carlos Lavin <carlos.lavin@vista-silicon.com>
Cc: video4linux-list <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: problem with the register of driver that works with soc_camera_subsystem
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4C51ED.8050708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe6fd5f61001120153v5604e61qd2900909b808be99@mail.gmail.com>



Carlos Lavin wrote:
> I am trying build a system on video with mx27 and ov7670 sensor but when I
> want register my driver that works with soc_camera subsystem in the 2.6.30
> version(I have works in this version because my boss wants it that way ), I
> executed the function "soc_camera_host_register(&mx27_soc_camera_host);" In
> the probe function of host-camera, this funcion is in the soc_camera.c and
> this function call to "scan_add_host" and this funcion is:
> 1- static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> 2- {
> 3-    struct soc_camera_device *icd;
> 4-    mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> 5-    list_for_each_entry(icd, &devices, list) {
> 6-        if (icd->iface == ici->nr) {
> 7-            icd->dev.parent = &ici->dev;
> 8-            device_register_link(icd);
> 9-        }
> 10-    }
> 11-   mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> 12-}
> 
> Well, in the probe function of camera-host I put ici->nr=0 (ici is
> soc_camera_host); but icd-> iface I don't know where is declared, in my chip
> camera I declare a soc_camera_device where I put the iface=0, but in this

In the device specific startup file, there needs to be a structure

static struct soc_camera_link iclink

I use the mach-pxa. Look in the arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c for 
an example of how to integrate a soc camera.

Cheers,
Ryan


> function, "scan_add_host" in the if of line 6, the icd-iface is different of
> 0, and the function device_register_link isn't executed.
> 
> In the chip_camera this function,"device_register_link"(is called for your
> appropriate function,scan_add_device) yes is executed, anybody know anything
> about this problem? is a problem or this function only is necessary to
> execute one once for both(chip-camera and host-camera), I think that is
> necessary that this function is executed for both but I am rookie in this
> topics. anybody help me?
> Thanks for your time.
> --
> video4linux-list mailing list
> Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-12  9:53 problem with the register of driver that works with soc_camera_subsystem Carlos Lavin
2010-01-12 10:41 ` Ryan Raasch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4C51ED.8050708@gmail.com \
    --to=ryan.raasch@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos.lavin@vista-silicon.com \
    --cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox