* Re: Fix for breakage caused by kfifo backport
2010-01-15 12:00 Fix for breakage caused by kfifo backport Andy Walls
@ 2010-01-15 12:59 ` Douglas Schilling Landgraf
2010-01-15 19:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Schilling Landgraf @ 2010-01-15 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Walls; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media
Hello Andy,
On 01/15/2010 10:00 AM, Andy Walls wrote:
> Mauro,
>
> At
>
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/cx23885-ir2
>
> I have a change checked in to fix the v4l-dvb compilation breakage for
> kernels less than 2.6.33 cause by the kfifo API change. I have fixed
> both the cx23885 and meye driver so they compile again for older
> kernels.
>
> All the changes in this repo are OK to PULL as is, even though I haven't
> finished all the changes for the TeVii S470 IR (I was planning on a
> PULL request late this evening EST). You can also just cherry pick the
> one that fixes the kfifo problem if you want.
>
> [I was unaware of the timing of the backport, but since it was stopping
> me from working, I fixed it as I thought appropriate.
Ouch, I was expecting to send the pull request for these changes before.
I have created the exactly same patches. Anyway, good that we have these
backports done.
> Please feel free
> to contact me on any backport changes that have my fingerprints all over
> it, with which you would like help. I'd like to help minimize the
> impact to users, testers, and developers, who may not have the bleeding
> edge kernel - or at least the impact to me ;) ]
>
>
Cheers,
Douglas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix for breakage caused by kfifo backport
2010-01-15 12:00 Fix for breakage caused by kfifo backport Andy Walls
2010-01-15 12:59 ` Douglas Schilling Landgraf
@ 2010-01-15 19:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-01-15 22:27 ` Andy Walls
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2010-01-15 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Walls; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media
Andy Walls wrote:
> Mauro,
>
> At
>
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/cx23885-ir2
>
> I have a change checked in to fix the v4l-dvb compilation breakage for
> kernels less than 2.6.33 cause by the kfifo API change. I have fixed
> both the cx23885 and meye driver so they compile again for older
> kernels.
As patches that do backports aren't applied upstream, they can't change any
line at the upstream code. However, your patch is changing two comments:
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 33)
+ kfifo_reset(state->rx_kfifo);
+#else
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&state->rx_kfifo_lock, flags);
kfifo_reset(&state->rx_kfifo);
- /* reset tx_fifo too if there is one... */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&state->rx_kfifo_lock, flags);
+#endif
@@ -977,6 +1000,7 @@
o->interrupt_enable = p->interrupt_enable;
o->enable = p->enable;
if (p->enable) {
+ /* reset tx_fifo here */
if (p->interrupt_enable)
irqenable_tx(dev, IRQEN_TSE);
control_tx_enable(dev, p->enable);
@@ -1256,8 +1280,15 @@
This means that upstream and your -hg will be different. Please, don't do that.
If you want to touch on comments or at the upstream code, please send a separate
patch.
>
> All the changes in this repo are OK to PULL as is, even though I haven't
> finished all the changes for the TeVii S470 IR (I was planning on a
> PULL request late this evening EST). You can also just cherry pick the
> one that fixes the kfifo problem if you want.
Yet, the series contains that issue I've already pointed:
+struct cx23885_ir_input {
...
+ char name[48];
+ char phys[48];
>
> [I was unaware of the timing of the backport, but since it was stopping
> me from working, I fixed it as I thought appropriate. Please feel free
> to contact me on any backport changes that have my fingerprints all over
> it, with which you would like help. I'd like to help minimize the
> impact to users, testers, and developers, who may not have the bleeding
> edge kernel - or at least the impact to me ;) ]
I do the backports when I'm about to prepare patches to submit upstream, generally
after doing a large patch merge.
That's said, maintainng both upstream and the backports are consuming a lot
of my time. I'll probably pass the task of keeping the -hg tree with the
backports to somebody else receiving and applying patches directly on my
-git tree.
Douglas already offered to do it, so I'll likely pass him the task to maintain
the -hg tree soon. Then, all patches there will be simply a backport of what
we'll have on -git.
Cheers,
Mauro.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread