From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:43162 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752538Ab0AUUEs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:04:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4B58B357.2040309@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:04:39 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil CC: Brandon Philips , Hans de Goede , Linux Media Mailing List , Douglas Landgraf Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git tree repositories & libv4l References: <4B55445A.10300@infradead.org> <20100120210740.GJ4015@jenkins.home.ifup.org> <4B57B6E4.2070500@infradead.org> <201001210823.04739.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <201001210823.04739.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Brandon Philips wrote: >>>> I've different experience in the projects with git I've used, as >>>> long as there are some governance rules (like never ever push -f, >>>> always do a rebase fix your stuff and then push, and if something >>>> else got in in the window in between rebase again, etc.). >>> If the group of people with commit access is small (3-4) it generally >>> works well. >> Yes. The more people touching at the same tree, the more troubles may happen. >> >> I don't object to allow a limited group of people accessing it, although >> I suspect that, if we open to more than one, we will have more than 4 people >> interested on it. > > In practice the only people who regularly touch v4l2-apps are Hans de Goede > (libv4l), you and myself (v4l2-ctl, v4l2-dbg, qv4l2). I can't remember anyone > else contributing regularly to v4l2-apps. It seems that you forgot me ;) After running the import proccess and have the contributions isolated, it would be easy to double check if nobody else is missed. Cheers, Mauro