From: "Németh Márton" <nm127@freemail.hu>
To: Thomas Kaiser <v4l@kaiser-linux.li>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
V4L Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libv4l: possible problem found in PAC7302 JPEG decoding
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:59:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6875F8.8040100@freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B68028D.8000405@kaiser-linux.li>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Kaiser wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 10:23 PM, Németh Márton wrote:
>> Hello Hans,
>>
>> while I was dealing with Labtec Webcam 2200 and with gspca_pac7302 driver I recognised the
>> following behaviour. The stream received from the webcam is splitted by the gspca_pac7302
>> subdriver when the byte sequence 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0x96 is found (pac_find_sof()).
>> Before transmitting the data to the userspace a JPEG header is added (pac_start_frame())
>> and the footer after the bytes 0xff, 0xd9 are removed.
>>
>> The data buffer which arrives to userspace looks like as follows (maybe not every detail is exact):
>>
>> 1. JPEG header
>>
>> 2. Some bytes of image data (near to 1024 bytes)
>>
>> 3. The byte sequence 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x01 followed by 1024 bytes of data.
>> This marker sequence and data repeats a couple of time. Exactly how much
>> depends on the image content.
>>
>> 4. The byte sequence 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02 followed by 512 bytes of data.
>> This marker sequence and data also repeats a couple of time.
>>
>> 5. The byte sequence 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00 followed by a variable amount of
>> image data bytes.
>>
>> 6. The End of Image (EOI) marker 0xff, 0xd9.
>>
>> Now what can be wrong with the libv4l? In libv4lconvert/tinyjpeg.c, line 315 there is a
>> huge macro which tries to remove the 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, xx byte sequence from the received
>> image. This fails, however, if the image contains 0xff bytes just before the 0xff, 0xff,
>> 0xff, xx sequence because one byte from the image data (the first 0xff) is removed, then
>> the three 0xff bytes from the marker is also removed. The xx (which really belongs to the
>> marker) is left in the image data instead of the original 0xff byte.
>>
>> Based on my experiments this problem sometimes causes corrupted image decoding or that the
>> JPEG image cannot be decoded at all.
>>
>
> Hello Németh
>
> I remember the problem as I was working on the PAC7311.
> http://www.kaiser-linux.li/index.php?title=PAC7311
>
>
> This is the code I used in the JPEG decoder to remove the 0xff 0xff 0xff
> 0xnn markers.
>
> See http://www.kaiser-linux.li/files/PAC7311/gspcav1-PAC7311-20070425.tar.gz
> decoder/gspcadecoder.c pac7311_decode()
Do you remember whether this code was working properly always?
Regards,
Márton Németh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 21:23 libv4l: possible problem found in PAC7302 JPEG decoding Németh Márton
2010-02-01 22:13 ` [PATCH ] libv4l: skip false Pixart markers Németh Márton
2010-02-02 10:30 ` Hans de Goede
2010-02-02 18:54 ` Németh Márton
2010-02-04 8:22 ` [PATCH libv4l tree, RFC] libv4l: skip false Pixart markers with buffer copy Németh Márton
2010-02-05 13:42 ` Hans de Goede
2010-02-05 16:43 ` Thomas Kaiser
2010-02-02 10:46 ` libv4l: possible problem found in PAC7302 JPEG decoding Thomas Kaiser
2010-02-02 18:59 ` Németh Márton [this message]
2010-02-02 19:48 ` Thomas Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6875F8.8040100@freemail.hu \
--to=nm127@freemail.hu \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v4l@kaiser-linux.li \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox