From: Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@arcor.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dheitmueller@kernellabs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:30:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B704A2D.5000100@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6FF3C9.2010804@redhat.com>
Am 08.02.2010 12:21, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> First, a few comments about your patch series:
>
> I've committed almost of your patches, and added an extra patch to make the
> driver to compile it with -git. There were other broken things when compiling
> against -git.
>
> Several of your patches are adding leading whitespaces. Please review them before
> submitting. On -git, those whitespaces are shown with a red background color.
>
> I've re-made most of the patch descriptions. Please take a look on them and try
> to improve on a next time.
>
> We've got 2 submission for each patches. I just discarded the older one.
>
> I've removed the two BEHOLDER board descriptions from one of your patches. It is
> not related to your board, but it is another compilation fix.
>
> From your series, I didn't merge those 3 patches:
>
> [5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77451
> [6/12] tm6000: tuner reset timeing optimation http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77459
> [11/12] tm6000: bugfix firmware xc3028L-v36.fw used with Zarlink and http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77462
>
> I'll send you separate comments why I didn't merge them, in reply to each email you've sent,
> starting with this one (patch 5/12).
>
>
> stefan.ringel@arcor.de wrote:
>
>> From: Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@arcor.de>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>> index 7ec13d5..a2e2af5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>> @@ -414,7 +414,15 @@ struct reg_init tm6010_init_tab[] = {
>> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0x3f, 0x00 },
>>
>> { REQ_05_SET_GET_USBREG, 0x18, 0x00 },
>> -
>> +
>> + /* additional from Terratec Cinergy Hybrid XE */
>> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdc, 0xaa },
>> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdd, 0x30 },
>> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xde, 0x20 },
>> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdf, 0xd0 },
>> + { REQ_04_EN_DISABLE_MCU_INT, 0x02, 0x00 },
>> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xd8, 0x2f },
>> +
>> /* set remote wakeup key:any key wakeup */
>> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xe5, 0xfe },
>> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xda, 0xff },
>> @@ -424,6 +432,7 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev)
>> {
>> int board, rc=0, i, size;
>> struct reg_init *tab;
>> + u8 buf[40];
>>
>> if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) {
>> tab = tm6010_init_tab;
>> @@ -444,61 +453,129 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */
>> -
>> - /* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */
>> - board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0);
>> - if (board >=0) {
>> - printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board);
>> - } else {
>> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board version\n",board);
>> - }
>> -
>> + /* hack */
>> if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) {
>> - /* Turn xceive 3028 on */
>> - tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6010_GPIO_3, 0x01);
>> - msleep(11);
>> - }
>>
> The above is board-specific. It is needed for the tm6010 device I have here
> (HVR900H), otherwise no xc3028 command will be handled.
>
> The better here is to add a setup routine to tm6000-cards and move all
> those GPIO codes to it. Then, add there your board-specific setup.
>
> I've added a patch that moves those GPIO board-specific setup to tm6000-cards:
> tm6000_cards_setup(). Please move your board specific GPIO init to there.
>
>
>
>> -
>> - /* Reset GPIO1 and GPIO4. */
>> - for (i=0; i< 2; i++) {
>> - rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> - dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x00);
>> - if (rc<0) {
>> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc);
>> - return rc;
>> - }
>> -
>> - msleep(10); /* Just to be conservative */
>> - rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> - dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x01);
>> - if (rc<0) {
>> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc);
>> - return rc;
>> - }
>> -
>> - msleep(10);
>> - rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, 0);
>> - if (rc<0) {
>> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc);
>> - return rc;
>> - }
>> -
>> - msleep(10);
>> - rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, 1);
>> - if (rc<0) {
>> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc);
>> - return rc;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!i) {
>> - rc=tm6000_get_reg16(dev, 0x40,0,0);
>> - if (rc>=0) {
>> - printk ("board=%d\n", rc);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 0);
>> + msleep(15);
>> +
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 0);
>> +
>> + msleep(50);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 1);
>> +
>>
> The above reflects the timing needed by your device. Depending on the board,
> the sleep time may eventually be different.
>
>
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x0010, 0x4400, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + buf[0] = 0x12;
>> + buf[1] = 0x34;
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x0032, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + buf[0] = 0x00;
>> + buf[1] = 0x01;
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x00c0, 0x0000, buf, 39);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + buf[0] = 0x00;
>> + buf[1] = 0x00;
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x7f1f, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>> +// printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf [1]);
>> + msleep(15);
>>
>
> At the above, you're just trying to reproduce whatever the original driver does,
> instead of relying on the i2c drivers.
>
> At the Linux drivers, we don't just send random i2c sequences in the middle of
> the setup. Instead, we let each i2c driver to do the initialization they need
> to do.
>
> If you take a look on each call, for example:
> tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>
> The first value determines the USB direction: 0x40 is write; 0xc0 is read;
> The second value is the request. Both 0x0e (REQ_14) and 0x10 (REQ_16) are used for
> i2c. From the past experiences, REQ_16 works better when the size is 1, where REQ_14
> works better for bigger sizes.
>
> The third value gives the first byte of a write message and the i2c address. The lower
> 8 bits is the i2c address. The above sequence is playing with several different
> i2c devices, at addresses 0x10, 0x32, 0xc0 and 0x1f.
>
> Most of the calls there are read (0xc0). I don't know any device that requires
> a read for it to work. I suspect that the above code is just probing to check
> what i2c devices are found at the board. The writes are to a device at address
> 0x32 (in i2c 8 bit notation - or 0x19 at i2c 7bit notation).
>
> I suspect that the probe sequence noticed something at the address 0x32 and is
> sending some init sequence for it. As this is not the tuner nor the demod, you
> don't need those setup for your device to work. Also, this address is not typical
> for eeprom. Without taking a look at the hardware, we can only guess what's there.
> My guess is that it is for some i2c-based remote controller chip. We don't need
> this for now. After having the rest working, we may need to return on it when
> patching ir-kbd.i2c.
>
>
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_0, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_7, 0);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_5, 1);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> +
>> + for (i=0; i< size; i++) {
>> + rc= tm6000_set_reg (dev, tab[i].req, tab[i].reg, tab[i].val);
>> + if (rc<0) {
>> + printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while setting req %d, "
>> + "reg %d to value %d\n", rc,
>> + tab[i].req,tab[i].reg, tab[i].val);
>> + return rc;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> +
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 0);
>> + msleep(15);
>> +
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 0);
>> +
>> + msleep(50);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 1);
>> +
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x00c2, 0x0008, buf, 2);
>> +// printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf[1]);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 0);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 0);
>> + msleep(15);
>> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>> + msleep(15);
>> }
>> + /* hack end
>>
> The above sequence is device-specific. Please add your code after I patch
> tm6000-cards.
>
> */
>
>> +
>> + msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */
>>
>> + /* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */
>> + if (dev->dev_type == TM5600) {
>> + board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0);
>> + if (board >=0) {
>> + printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board);
>> + } else {
>> + printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board version\n",board);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> msleep(50);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>
>
I have a question, how can I implemented the reinit after activating
demodulator when it use tm6000_cards_setup().
--
Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@arcor.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 22:48 [PATCH 1/12] tm6000: add Terratec Cinergy Hybrid XE stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 2/12] tm6000: avoid unregister the driver after success at tm6000_init_dev stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 3/12] tm6000: clean the identifer string stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 4/12] tm6000: adding special usb request to quiting tuner transfer stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 7/12] tm6000: add tuner callback for dvb frontend stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 8/12] tm6000: add tuner parameter stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 9/12] tm6000: remove unused function stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 10/12] tm6000: bugfix usb DVB transfer stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 11/12] tm6000: bugfix firmware xc3028L-v36.fw used with Zarlink and DTV78 or DTV8 no shift stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 12/12] tm6000: add a different set param values stefan.ringel
2010-02-08 11:21 ` [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 11:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 16:12 ` Stefan Ringel
2010-02-08 17:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 17:34 ` Stefan Ringel
2010-02-08 17:37 ` Stefan Ringel
2010-02-08 17:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 17:30 ` Stefan Ringel [this message]
2010-02-08 18:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 19:07 ` Stefan Ringel
2010-02-08 19:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-08 20:04 ` zl10335 with tm6010 or tm6000 Stefan Ringel
2010-02-10 17:09 ` [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 Stefan Ringel
2010-02-10 17:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-05 22:57 [PATCH 1/12] tm6000: add Terratec Cinergy Hybrid XE stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/12] tm6000: avoid unregister the driver after success at tm6000_init_dev stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/12] tm6000: clean the identifer string stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH 4/12] tm6000: adding special usb request to quiting tuner transfer stefan.ringel
2010-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 stefan.ringel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B704A2D.5000100@arcor.de \
--to=stefan.ringel@arcor.de \
--cc=dheitmueller@kernellabs.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox