From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] video_device: don't free_irq() an element past array vpif_obj.dev[] and fix test
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:59:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B714E15.4020909@gmail.com> (raw)
In vpif_get_std_info(): std_info doesn't need the NULL test, it was already
dereferenced anyway. If std_info->stdid is 0 we could early return -1.
In vpif_probe(): local variable q was only assigned. If we error out with
either last two goto's then j equals VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES. So after the
probe_out: label, k also reaches VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES after the loop. In
the first iteration in the loop after vpif_int_err: a free_irq() can occur
of an element &vpif_obj.dev[VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES]->channel_id which is
outside vpif_obj.dev[] array boundaries.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
Or am I mistaken?
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c
index dfddef7..8f6605d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static int vpif_get_std_info(struct channel_obj *ch)
int index;
std_info->stdid = vid_ch->stdid;
- if (!std_info)
+ if (!std_info->stdid)
return -1;
for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(ch_params); index++) {
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct vpif_subdev_info *subdevdata;
struct vpif_display_config *config;
- int i, j = 0, k, q, m, err = 0;
+ int i, j = 0, k, m, err = 0;
struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap;
struct common_obj *common;
struct channel_obj *ch;
@@ -1573,10 +1573,12 @@ probe_out:
video_device_release(ch->video_dev);
ch->video_dev = NULL;
}
+ if (k == VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES)
+ k = VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES - 1;
vpif_int_err:
v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
vpif_err("VPIF IRQ request failed\n");
- for (q = k; k >= 0; k--) {
+ for (; k >= 0; k--) {
for (m = i; m >= res->start; m--)
free_irq(m, (void *)(&vpif_obj.dev[k]->channel_id));
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, k-1);
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 11:59 Roel Kluin [this message]
2010-02-18 16:31 ` [PATCH] video_device: don't free_irq() an element past array vpif_obj.dev[] and fix test Karicheri, Muralidharan
2010-02-18 20:02 ` roel kluin
2010-02-18 20:25 ` Karicheri, Muralidharan
2010-02-19 19:35 ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-19 19:50 ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-19 23:28 ` Roel Kluin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B714E15.4020909@gmail.com \
--to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox