From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45111 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755452Ab0BKP3X (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:29:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4B742227.3000400@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:28:39 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samuel Ortiz CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Richard_R=F6jfors?= , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Add support for the timberdale FPGA. References: <4B66C36A.4000005@pelagicore.com> <4B693ED7.4060401@redhat.com> <20100203100326.GA3460@sortiz.org> <4B694D69.1090201@redhat.com> <20100203123617.GF3460@sortiz.org> <4B69B12D.6030105@redhat.com> <20100204092846.GA3336@sortiz.org> <4B71D70A.6030806@pelagicore.com> <20100211152620.GA6025@sortiz.org> In-Reply-To: <20100211152620.GA6025@sortiz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Samuel Ortiz wrote: >> Now when the radio driver made it into the media tree, can I post an >> updated MFD which defines these drivers too? >> Is a complete MFD patch preferred, or just an incremental against the >> last one? > Since the mfd driver is currently merged into Mauro's tree, you should make > incremental patches against it. At least that's how I'd take it in my tree. > Mauro, do you agree ? Yes. Richard, just send me an incremental patch against my -git tree. Cheers, Mauro