From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.4.197]:48498 "EHLO mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751585Ab0BOOlb (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:41:31 -0500 Received: from MacBook-Pro.local (ool-18bfe0d5.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.224.213]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0KXW0032V0T6N8D0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:41:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:41:30 -0500 From: Steven Toth Subject: Re: cx23885 In-reply-to: To: Michael Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <4B795D1A.9040502@kernellabs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <1266238446.3075.13.camel@palomino.walls.org> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2/15/10 8:15 AM, Michael wrote: > Hi Andy > >>> Does anybody know whether this card is currently supported >> >> Likely no. I have not checked the source to be sure. >> > Is this because the driver does not have the right capabilities or is it > "just" a PCI-id missing in the driver? A mixture of both, analog support in the 885 driver is limited. Generally, yes - start by adding the PCI id. > > The latter would be quite easy to add, I guess. >> >>> and if yes, is it >>> by cx88 or by cx23885? >>> >>> http://www.commell.com.tw/Product/Surveillance/MPX-885.htm >>> >>> It is based on the Connexant 23885 chip but uses an Mini-PCIe interface. >> >> cx88 handles PCI bridge chips: CX2388[0123] >> >> cx23885 handles PCIe bridge chips: CX2388[578] >> >> > From the picture of the card from the datasheet it has a CX23885 chip. >> > > That means, if a driver might support it, then the cx23885 driver not the > cx88, correct? Correct. -- Steven Toth - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com +1.646.355.8490