From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
m-karicheri2@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v1 0/4] Multi-plane video buffer support for V4L2 API and videobuf
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:49:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B82C3A5.7070707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266855010-2198-1-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com>
Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a preliminary implementation of multi-planar buffer support for V4L2
> and videobuf.
>
> It is a rather big change so I wanted to put it up for discussion sooner rather
> than later, in case we decide to go in a completely different direction.
>
> We are proposing backward compatible extensions to the V4L2 API
This seems to be the better way. Of course, tests are needed to be sure that no regression
will be introduced by it.
> and a redesign
> of memory handling in videobuf core and its memory type modules. The videobuf
> redesign should have a minimal impact on current drivers though. No videobuf
> high-level logic (queuing, etc.) has been changed.
Seems reasonable.
> Only streaming I/O has been tested, read/write might not work correctly.
> vivi has been adapted for testing and demonstration purposes, but other drivers
> will not compile. Tests have been made on vivi and on an another driver for an
> embedded device (those involved dma-contig and USERPTR as well). I am not
> attaching that driver, as I expect nobody would be able to compile/test it
> anyway.
It would be interesting if you could add userptr support for videobuf-vmalloc, and
test all supported modes with vivi. This helps to test the changes against existing
userspace applications before needing to touch on all drivers.
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-22 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 16:10 [PATCH/RFC v1 0/4] Multi-plane video buffer support for V4L2 API and videobuf Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] v4l: add missing checks for kzalloc returning NULL Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 17:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-22 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] v4l: Add support for multi-plane buffers to V4L2 API Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] v4l: videobuf: Add support for multi-plane buffers Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] v4l: vivi: add 2- and 3-planar YCbCr422 Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 16:10 ` [EXAMPLE v1] Test application for multiplane vivi driver Pawel Osciak
2010-02-22 17:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2010-02-23 9:39 ` [PATCH/RFC v1 0/4] Multi-plane video buffer support for V4L2 API and videobuf Pawel Osciak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B82C3A5.7070707@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=p.osciak@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox