From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37104 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750930Ab0BWAl0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:41:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4B83242E.40703@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:41:18 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Philips CC: Hans Verkuil , Hans de Goede , Linux Media Mailing List , Douglas Landgraf Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git tree repositories & libv4l References: <4B55445A.10300@infradead.org> <4B5B30E4.7030909@redhat.com> <20100222225426.GC4013@jenkins.home.ifup.org> <201002230026.59712.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <20100222233808.GD4013@jenkins.home.ifup.org> In-Reply-To: <20100222233808.GD4013@jenkins.home.ifup.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Brandon Philips wrote: > On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote: >>> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>>> lib/ >>>>> libv4l1/ >>>>> libv4l2/ >>>>> libv4lconvert/ >>>>> utils/ >>>>> v4l2-dbg >>>>> v4l2-ctl >>>>> cx18-ctl >>>>> ivtv-ctl >>>>> contrib/ >>>>> test/ >>>>> everything else >>>>> >>> git clone git://ifup.org/philips/create-v4l-utils.git >>> cd create-v4l-utils/ >>> ./convert.sh >>> >>> You should now have v4l-utils.git which should have this directory >>> struture. If we need to move other things around let me know and I can >>> tweak name-filter.sh >>> >>> Thoughts? Let me know how we should proceed with dropping v4l2-apps >>> from v4l-dvb. >>> >>> Re: code style cleanup. I think we should do that once we drop >>> v4l2-apps/ from v4l-dvb and make the new v4l-utils.git upstream. >> Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was >> merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports >> v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we >> should also merge the tools to a media-utils repository. >> >> It remains a fact of life that dvb and v4l are connected and trying to >> artificially keep them apart does not make much sense to me. > > Easy to do but who should be the maintainer of the dvb things? > > According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if > no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and > clutter up the git tree with dead code? > > Cheers, > > Brandon > > [1] http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxTV_dvb-apps That's weird. I've recently added support for ISDB-T on it: http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mchehab/dvb-apps-isdbt2/ and we've got some comments at the mailing list. Btw, the patches I added there also adds DVB-S2 support to szap/scan, but tests are needed, since I don't have any satellite dish nowadays. -- Cheers, Mauro