From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from relay01.digicable.hu ([92.249.128.189]:59161 "EHLO relay01.digicable.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753137Ab0BXIO4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:14:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4B84DFFC.9010904@freemail.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:14:52 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TsOpbWV0aCBNw6FydG9u?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Francois Moine CC: Hans de Goede , Theodore Kilgore , Thomas Kaiser , V4L Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] gspca pac7302: add USB PID range based on heuristics References: <4B655949.50102@freemail.hu> <4B6575AC.7060100@redhat.com> <4B84D0B5.8040005@freemail.hu> <20100224082822.2191df80@tele> In-Reply-To: <20100224082822.2191df80@tele> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:09:41 +0100 > Németh Márton wrote: > >> On the schematics in PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet >> (http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf) >> pages 19, 20, 21 and 22 there is a note titled "PID IO_TRAP" which >> describes the possible product ID range 0x2620..0x262f. In this range >> there are some known webcams, however, there are some PIDs with >> unknown or future devices. Because PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 is a System >> on a Chip (SoC) device is is probable that this driver will work >> correctly independent of the used PID. > > Hello, > > I got such information from ms-win drivers. I appeared that most of the > unknown/new webcams were never manufactured. Now, I wait for user > requests before adding such webcams. What about Genius iSlim 310? Based on the Windows driver this device is a potential candidate for pac7302 driver, see http://linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/PixArt_PAC7301/PAC7302#Identification I don't have access to Genius iSlim 310 so I cannot tell it for sure. Regards, Márton Németh