From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
helmut@helmutauer.de, moinejf@free.fr, m-karicheri2@ti.com,
pboettcher@dibcom.fr, tobias.lorenz@gmx.net, awalls@radix.net,
khali@linux-fr.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, abraham.manu@gmail.com,
davidtlwong@gmail.com, stoth@kernellabs.com
Subject: Re: Status of the patches under review (29 patches)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:57:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B85224C.7080206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002240807100.4741@axis700.grange>
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Mauro
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suspect that Linus should be releasing the 2.6.33 kernel any time soon,
>> so the next merge window is about to open. I've handled already everything
>> on my pending queues. However, I missed some emails due to a crash on my
>> exim filter. Also, patchwork.kernel.org missed some emails due to some
>> trouble there. So, maybe there are still some unnoticed pending stuff.
>
> Looks like you missed about two of my pull requests.
>
>> If you still have any pending work for 2.6.34 that aren't merged nor
>> are under review, please submit it ASAP, as patches received after the
>> release of 2.6.33 will likely be postponed to 2.6.35.
>
> Namely:
>
>> == soc_camera patches - Waiting Guennadi <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> submission/review ==
>>
>> Feb, 9 2010: mt9t031: use runtime pm support to restore ADDRESS_MODE registers http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77997
>
> This one depends on my runtime-pm patch (which is not listed here btw),
> which we didn't come to a consensus about, so, I think, I'll just push
> both of them and let you decide whether or not to pull.
Yes, please do it. I'll keep it as "under review" for now.
>
>> Feb,19 2010: v4l: soc_camera: fix bound checking of mbus_fmt[] index http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/80757
>
> This one
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/16068/match=pull+soc+camera)
This one I missed. Applying it.
> and
>
>> Feb, 2 2010: [1/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76212
This patch were applied only to the fixes.git tree:
commit 2b59125b1b5f8c9bb0524b8a0bdad4b780a239ac
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date: Tue Feb 2 13:17:54 2010 +0900
soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode
This polling is needed if camera is in standby mode, but current exiting
condition is inverted.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
I'll merge it back to v4l-dvb.git when merging 2.6.33, after its release.
Removed it from my queue, since it should be upstream already.
> this one are in fixes branch of
> http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/soc-camera.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fixes
> which I asked you to pull in
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg16281.html
>
>> Feb, 2 2010: [2/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify delay time after initialize http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76213
>> Feb, 2 2010: [3/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: The flag which control camera-init is http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76214
>
> These two have been put on hold by Morimoto-san.
Ok, I think I'll keep them at the "Under Review" status.
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 5:40 Status of the patches under review (29 patches) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-24 7:22 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-02-24 12:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2010-02-24 9:18 ` Jean Delvare
2010-02-24 13:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-25 9:59 ` Jean Delvare
2010-02-24 13:25 ` Andy Walls
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B85224C.7080206@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
--cc=awalls@radix.net \
--cc=davidtlwong@gmail.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=helmut@helmutauer.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=pboettcher@dibcom.fr \
--cc=stoth@kernellabs.com \
--cc=tobias.lorenz@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox