From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4834 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756522Ab0BXM63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:58:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4B85224C.7080206@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:57:48 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski CC: LMML , helmut@helmutauer.de, moinejf@free.fr, m-karicheri2@ti.com, pboettcher@dibcom.fr, tobias.lorenz@gmx.net, awalls@radix.net, khali@linux-fr.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, abraham.manu@gmail.com, davidtlwong@gmail.com, stoth@kernellabs.com Subject: Re: Status of the patches under review (29 patches) References: <4B84BBB0.1020408@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Mauro > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I suspect that Linus should be releasing the 2.6.33 kernel any time soon, >> so the next merge window is about to open. I've handled already everything >> on my pending queues. However, I missed some emails due to a crash on my >> exim filter. Also, patchwork.kernel.org missed some emails due to some >> trouble there. So, maybe there are still some unnoticed pending stuff. > > Looks like you missed about two of my pull requests. > >> If you still have any pending work for 2.6.34 that aren't merged nor >> are under review, please submit it ASAP, as patches received after the >> release of 2.6.33 will likely be postponed to 2.6.35. > > Namely: > >> == soc_camera patches - Waiting Guennadi submission/review == >> >> Feb, 9 2010: mt9t031: use runtime pm support to restore ADDRESS_MODE registers http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77997 > > This one depends on my runtime-pm patch (which is not listed here btw), > which we didn't come to a consensus about, so, I think, I'll just push > both of them and let you decide whether or not to pull. Yes, please do it. I'll keep it as "under review" for now. > >> Feb,19 2010: v4l: soc_camera: fix bound checking of mbus_fmt[] index http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/80757 > > This one > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/16068/match=pull+soc+camera) This one I missed. Applying it. > and > >> Feb, 2 2010: [1/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76212 This patch were applied only to the fixes.git tree: commit 2b59125b1b5f8c9bb0524b8a0bdad4b780a239ac Author: Kuninori Morimoto Date: Tue Feb 2 13:17:54 2010 +0900 soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode This polling is needed if camera is in standby mode, but current exiting condition is inverted. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab I'll merge it back to v4l-dvb.git when merging 2.6.33, after its release. Removed it from my queue, since it should be upstream already. > this one are in fixes branch of > http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/soc-camera.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fixes > which I asked you to pull in > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg16281.html > >> Feb, 2 2010: [2/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify delay time after initialize http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76213 >> Feb, 2 2010: [3/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: The flag which control camera-init is http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76214 > > These two have been put on hold by Morimoto-san. Ok, I think I'll keep them at the "Under Review" status. -- Cheers, Mauro