From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30950 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756781Ab0BXNKx (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:10:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4B852538.2050207@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:10:16 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare , Douglas Landgraf CC: LMML Subject: Re: Status of the patches under review (29 patches) References: <4B84BBB0.1020408@redhat.com> <20100224101807.60a468c3@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20100224101807.60a468c3@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jean, Jean Delvare wrote: > I have 3 patches pending which aren't in your list. I can see them in > patchwork: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/79755/ > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/79754/ > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77349/ > > The former two are in "Accepted" state, and actually I received an > e-mail telling me they had been accepted, however I can't see them in > the hg repository. So where are they? They are already on the git tree: commit 2887117b31b77ebe5fb42f95ea8d77a3716b405b Author: Jean Delvare Date: Tue Feb 16 14:22:37 2010 -0300 V4L/DVB: bttv: Let the user disable IR support Add a new module parameter "disable_ir" to disable IR support. Several other drivers do that already, and this can be very handy for debugging purposes. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab commit e151340a2a9e7147eb48114af0381122130266b0 Author: Jean Delvare Date: Fri Feb 19 00:18:41 2010 -0300 V4L/DVB: bttv: Move I2C IR initialization Move I2C IR initialization from just after I2C bus setup to right before non-I2C IR initialization. This avoids the case where an I2C IR device is blocking audio support (at least the PV951 suffers from this). It is also more logical to group IR support together, regardless of the connectivity. This fixes bug #15184: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15184 Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab As patches in -hg are manually backported, maybe Douglas haven't backported it yet or he simply missed. Douglas, could you please check this? > The latter is in "Not Applicable" state, and I have no idea what it > means. The patch is really simple and I see no formatting issue. Should > I just resend it? This means that this patch is not applicable on -git. There's no versions.txt upstream. All patches that don't have upstream code are marked as such on patchwork. I generally ping Douglas on such cases, for him to double check on -hg. Anyway, the better is to c/c to Douglas on all patches that are meant only to the building system. Douglas, could you please check if you've applied this patch? -- Cheers, Mauro