From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6200 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751297Ab0CFRLq (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:11:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4B928CBF.8070807@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:11:27 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Jean Delvare , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linuxtv-commits-bounces@linuxtv.org, linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.org, "Eric W.Biederman" Subject: Re: [git:v4l-dvb/master] sysfs: sysfs_sd_setattr set iattrs unconditionally References: <20100306170655.03d97556@hyperion.delvare> <20100306161251.GA23287@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20100306161251.GA23287@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:06:55PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: >> Err, what's happening here? I can't see any chmod call in any V4L or DVB >> driver, so why would this patch matter there? And we will get this fix >> through Linus' tree anyway, so why bother at all? I'm puzzled. > > I'm confused too, I got a bunch of these, for patches that seem to be in > Linus's tree already. Did a script go haywire? Sorry! There's an post receive hook script that sends an email to the patch author/SOB's for the new patches added at v4l-dvb git tree. Unfortunately, the git mailbomb script did something wrong: it handled badly all the upstream patches that were merged back on git. I'll need to figure out a way for it to exclude patches that got merged from the normal posts. For now, I've disabled it and removed the patches that were on the queue. -- Cheers, Mauro