From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:46857 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750999Ab0CIRQP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:16:15 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2989335fgg.1 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:16:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B968267.3090808@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:16:23 +1000 From: Jed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Hw capabilities of the HVR-2200 References: <4AAF568D.1070308@gmail.com> <4AB3B43A.2030103@gmail.com> <4AB3B947.1040202@kernellabs.com> <4AB3C17D.1030300@gmail.com> <4AB3C8E5.4010700@kernellabs.com> <4AB3CDC2.20505@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AB3CDC2.20505@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 19/09/09 Jed wrote: >>>>>> 2) Component input for the A/V-in >>>> >>>> Yes, this exists on the HVR2250 product only. >>> >>> Ah shite, are you sure? >>> If you look at the specs for the reference card it was there, did they >>> take it out at the last minute? >> >> It's not feature Hauppauge supports on the HVR2200 today. I have a >> suspicion this may change but I'm neither confirming, denying or >> announcing anything. It would make sense to officially support >> component cables on the HVR2200 since the silicon supports it. If/when >> it does I'm sure it will be mentioned in the forums or on the HVR2200 >> product packaging. Hi Steve, when you said this is not a feature Hauppauge supports. Did you mean it's not fully enabled physically in the PCB... Or is it just something they need to add support for in the driver? If the latter do you know if their policy has changed or is about to? >>>>>> 3) Hw encode bypass for A/V-in >>>> >>>> No idea. Regardless of whether it does or does not I wouldn't plan to >>>> add basic raw TV support to the driver, without going through the >>>> encoder. >>> >>> Why do you rule it out unequivocally, is it just because I've annoyed >>> you? :-( >> >> Raw analog TV isn't a high priority feature on my mental check-list. >> Analog TV via the encoder is much more interesting and applicable to >> many people. Assuming that progress has been made on analogue to h.263/mpeg4/VC-1/DivX/Xvid via the A/V-in encoder. Is this still considered a low priority? Has progress been made on hw encode via A/V-in? I'm "finally" putting my entire system together soon, can't wait! Looking forward to seeing how everything has progressed. I'll be sure to do some donations once I'm up & running!