From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.217.217]:42468 "EHLO mail-gx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755734Ab0CKOWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:22:43 -0500 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so50684gxk.8 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:22:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B98FABB.1040605@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:14:19 -0300 From: Douglas Schilling Landgraf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hermann pitton CC: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, Devin Heitmueller Subject: Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt References: <201003090848.29301.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <1268197457.3199.17.camel@pc07.localdom.local> In-Reply-To: <1268197457.3199.17.camel@pc07.localdom.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: > Hi Hans, both, > > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: >> It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop >> utilities! >> >> After a quick check I noticed that the i2c-id.h header was copied from the >> kernel. This is not necessary. The only utility that includes this is v4l2-dbg >> and that one no longer needs it. Hans, can you remove this? >> >> The second question is whether anyone would object if alevt is moved from >> dvb-apps to v4l-utils? It is much more appropriate to have that tool in >> v4l-utils. > > i wonder that this stays such calm, hopefully a good sign. > > In fact alevt analog should come with almost every distribution, but the > former alevt-dvb, named now only alevt, well, might be ok in some > future, is enhanced for doing also dvb-t-s and hence there ATM. > >> Does anyone know of other unmaintained but useful tools that we might merge >> into v4l-utils? E.g. xawtv perhaps? > > If for xawtv could be some more care, ships also since close to ever > with alevtd, that would be fine, but I'm not sure we are talking about > tools anymore in such case, since xawtv4x, tvtime and mpeg4ip ;) for > example are also there and unmaintained. > I think would be nice to hear a word from Devin, which have been working in tvtime. Devin? Cheers Douglas