From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65305 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753156Ab0CMGdj (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:33:39 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2D6XdPu001801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:33:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4B9B337F.50203@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:41:03 +0100 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: pushes at v4l-utils tree References: <4B99891E.9010406@redhat.com> <4B9A62B6.7090004@redhat.com> <4B9A962A.2020407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B9A962A.2020407@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On 03/12/2010 08:29 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at >>> v4l-utils, >>> today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related and 1 >>> is .gitignore >>> stuff). One of the reasons were to test the viability for such commits. >>> >>> I've temporarily enabled the same script that we use for upstream >>> patches to >>> generate patches against linuxtv-commits ML. >>> >>> From my experiences, I have some notes: >>> 1) git won't work fine if more than one is committing at the same >>> tree. >>> The reason is simple: it won't preserve the same group as the previous >>> commits. So, >>> the next committer will have troubles if we allow multiple committers; >>> >> >> I assume you are talking about some issues with permissions on the >> server side here ? > > Yes. The new objects and the touched files got a different group ownership > after git push. I had to manually fix them at the server. > I'll get you in touch with one of the Fedora infrastructure admins. Regards, Hans