From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9679 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754631Ab0CQVDa (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:03:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA14398.70609@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:03:20 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil CC: Pawel Osciak , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] v4l: videobuf: code cleanup. References: <1268831061-307-1-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> <1268831061-307-2-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> <201003172134.47721.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <201003172134.47721.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Wednesday 17 March 2010 14:04:21 Pawel Osciak wrote: >> Make videobuf pass checkpatch; minor code cleanups. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak >> Reviewed-by: Kyungmin Park > > Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil > > It would be really nice if this can be merged soon. With all the work that > we want to do on videobuf it makes life easier if it is cleaned up first. > > I wonder if it is perhaps possible to get this merged for 2.6.34-rc2? > That way it will be easier to merge fixes there. Although I think that it > is unlikely that we will want to make any videobuf changes for 2.6.34. Videobuf changes for 2.6.34? Only if you catch a bug that affect the current drivers and after lots of testing. It seems very unlikely. I don't see any reason to send a pure cleanup patch outside the merge window. So, after review, I'll add it at v4l-dvb.git tree (so, a patch for 2.6.35). -- Cheers, Mauro