Is this the right list for Hauppauge HD-PVR issues?

Is this the right list for Hauppauge HD-PVR issues?

[Mark]

As the title states, what's the right list?


--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

Re: Is this the right list for Hauppauge HD-PVR issues?

[Nicolas Riendeau]

Mark wrote:
> As the title states, what's the right list?
> 
> 

Hi!

This mailing list is essentially dead (I must confess I wonder why they haven't 
deleted it).

The appropriate mailing list for the Hauppauge HD-PVR would most probably be linux-media.

re: http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media

Have a nice day!

Nick

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

video4linux-list@redhat.com

[CityK]

On the video4linux mailing list,

Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>> what's the right list?
>>
>
> This mailing list is essentially dead (I must confess I wonder why
> they haven't deleted it).

Indeed. At this point, its become a community disservice not to have a
redirect/pointer to the new list.

Is there anyone at Red Hat who can set up an auto reply redirector to
the Linux Media Mailing List
(http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media ) for any new mails
set into the v4l mailing list?

I don't know how many people are still subscribed to the v4l, but that
number is got to be dwindling, and I think its long about past the time
that we turn the lights off.

video4linux-list@redhat.com

[amol verule]

hi,
 i am having iball 9.0 device and getting error while opening it as
#camorama -D
VIDIOCGCAP  --  could not get camera capabilities, exiting.....

#ls -l /dev/video0
crw-rw---- 1 root video 81, 0 2009-03-09 18:16 /dev/video0

 this is dmesg when i plugged in camera
usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 4
usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
Linux video capture interface: v2.00
sn9c102: V4L2 driver for SN9C1xx PC Camera Controllers v1:1.44
usb 1-1: SN9C120 PC Camera Controller detected (vid:pid 0x0C45:0x6130)
usb 1-1: MI-0360 image sensor detected
usb 1-1: Initialization succeeded
usb 1-1: V4L2 device registered as /dev/video0
usb 1-1: Optional device control through 'sysfs' interface disabled
usbcore: registered new interface driver sn9c102
usbcore: registered new interface driver gspca
/usr/src/modules/gspca/gspca_core.c: gspca driver 01.00.20 registered
...
what is actual problem even though driver is available and it created
/dev/video0 ..i am not able to use webcam..
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

Re: video4linux-list@redhat.com

[Jean-Francois Moine]

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:07:10 +0530
amol verule <amol.debian@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi,

Hi Amol,

>  i am having iball 9.0 device and getting error while opening it as
> #camorama -D
> VIDIOCGCAP  --  could not get camera capabilities, exiting.....
> 
> #ls -l /dev/video0
> crw-rw---- 1 root video 81, 0 2009-03-09 18:16 /dev/video0
> 
>  this is dmesg when i plugged in camera
> usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 4
> usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> sn9c102: V4L2 driver for SN9C1xx PC Camera Controllers v1:1.44
> usb 1-1: SN9C120 PC Camera Controller detected (vid:pid 0x0C45:0x6130)
> usb 1-1: MI-0360 image sensor detected
> usb 1-1: Initialization succeeded
> usb 1-1: V4L2 device registered as /dev/video0
> usb 1-1: Optional device control through 'sysfs' interface disabled
> usbcore: registered new interface driver sn9c102
> usbcore: registered new interface driver gspca
> /usr/src/modules/gspca/gspca_core.c: gspca driver 01.00.20 registered
> ...
> what is actual problem even though driver is available and it created
> /dev/video0 ..i am not able to use webcam..

You have 2 drivers: sn9c102 and gspca v1.

- sn9c102 may or may not handle correctly your webcam.

- gspca v1 is not maintained anymore. You _must_ use gspca v2 instead.

As both drivers may handle your webcam, when both are generated, only
sn9c102 does the job. If it does not work, you must change the media
config removing the sn9c102 driver.

> --
> video4linux-list mailing list

You should not use this mailing list. The new one is in the Cc: field
of this message.

Cheers.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/