From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bld-mail15.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.100]:43490 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751759Ab0EEFEI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 01:04:08 -0400 Received: from Jeds-Mini.local (unverified [118.208.148.114]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 11524119-1927428 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 14:34:03 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <4BE0FC87.4010406@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:05:11 +1000 From: Jed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Hauppauge HVR-4400 References: <201005041400.10530.jan_moebius@web.de> <4BE03311.4010702@gmail.com> <4BE03D6A.5060100@kernellabs.com> In-Reply-To: <4BE03D6A.5060100@kernellabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On 5/4/10 10:45 AM, Jed wrote: >> Oh wow I didn't know Hauppauge had released some new models above the >> 2200. >> http://www.hauppauge.co.uk/site/products/prods_hvr_internal.html >> Is this 4400 exactly the same as the HVR-2200, aside from the >> demodulator used for it's DVB-S/S2? >> I hope so, that way work being done on the 2200 can flow onto this! >> (cept for DVB-S/S2) > > It's completely different. Bummer!!! :( Why'd they have to go & use a completely different architecture, lame.