From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0BE03C.8000709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100606124302.GA10119@linux-m68k.org>
On 06/06/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested
> it for many hours, definitely seems to improve the behaviour.
>
> I have left out your beautification suggestion for now, want to do more playing with
> other aspects of the driver. There still seem to be issues when the device is unplugged
> while in use and such.
>
> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c.rz 2010-06-03 21:58:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c 2010-06-04 23:00:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1100,31 +1100,26 @@
> *
> * @return pointer to descriptor on success, NULL on error.
> */
> -struct smscore_buffer_t *smscore_getbuffer(struct smscore_device_t *coredev)
> +
> +struct smscore_buffer_t *get_entry(void)
> {
> struct smscore_buffer_t *cb = NULL;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&coredev->bufferslock, flags);
Sorry, maybe I'm just blind, but where is 'coredev' defined in this
scope? You probably forgot to pass it to get_entry?
How could this be compiled? Is there coredev defined globally?
> -
> - /* This function must return a valid buffer, since the buffer list is
> - * finite, we check that there is an available buffer, if not, we wait
> - * until such buffer become available.
> - */
> -
> - prepare_to_wait(&coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -
> - if (list_empty(&coredev->buffers))
> - schedule();
> -
> - finish_wait(&coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, &wait);
> -
> + if (!list_empty(&coredev->buffers)) {
> cb = (struct smscore_buffer_t *) coredev->buffers.next;
> list_del(&cb->entry);
> -
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&coredev->bufferslock, flags);
> + return cb;
> +}
> +
> +struct smscore_buffer_t *smscore_getbuffer(struct smscore_device_t *coredev)
> +{
> + struct smscore_buffer_t *cb = NULL;
> +
> + wait_event(coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, (cb = get_entry()));
>
> return cb;
> }
--
js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-06 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100530145240.GA21559@linux-m68k.org>
2010-05-30 15:24 ` schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave? Jiri Slaby
2010-05-30 15:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-01 17:17 ` Richard Zidlicky
2010-06-06 12:43 ` [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave Richard Zidlicky
2010-06-06 17:51 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2010-06-07 13:00 ` Richard Zidlicky
2010-07-06 12:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0BE03C.8000709@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rz@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox