From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:42419 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751835Ab0GFHC1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 03:02:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4C32D4BE.9030005@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:01:18 +0200 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Walls CC: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, fweisbec@gmail.com, dwalker@codeaurora.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, florian@mickler.org, andi@firstfloor.org, mst@redhat.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35] ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue References: <1277759063-24607-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1277759063-24607-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1278349860.2229.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1278349860.2229.9.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for > ivtv looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Walls > Acked-by: Andy Walls May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this whole patchset will end up, I think it would be better to keep things isolated in this branch. Thank you. -- tejun