public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@wilsonet.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Plumber's Conference: Call for Working Session Submissions
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:37:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4C846C.90904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim4RiB8JXi8UfzkdnJRXDRL8995WT=431kyS1=R@mail.gmail.com>

Em 25-07-2010 15:20, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jarod,
>>
>> Em 25-07-2010 13:10, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
>>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>>> <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> CFP dead line for submitting proposals to LPC/2010 is approaching.
>>>> For those that intends to submit proposals for it, please do it quickly,
>>>> as the official dead line is July, 26.
>>>
>>> I've submitted a proposal for a Linux HTPC presentation, intending to
>>> cover everything from low-level v4l/dvb drivers, video decoder drivers
>>> and IR drivers, up the stack to userspace (primarily mythtv and a bit
>>> of xbmc). Also submitted a micro-conf proposal for media-related bits,
>>> as I didn't see one yet, and at the time, the proposal submission
>>> deadline was only a day or two out (this was before it got extended to
>>> the 26th) and I believe you were on vacation,
>>
>> Good to know. Yes, I was on vacation, just returning back and trying to get rid
>> of the immense amount of emails and spams from my inboxes...
> 
> One of the many joys of returning from vacation... :)

Yeah...

>> To be clear, the dead line for the LPC conf is by July, 26, but we still have
>> more time for the mini-conf tracks.
>>
>>> so your submission and
>>> mine are essentially duplicates.
>>>
>>> http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/proposals/621
>>> http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/proposals/195
>>
>> No, they won't conflict. My "proposal" is for leading the mini-conf panel, and not
>> for the presentation itself (it is not really a proposal - it is just the way it
>> is defined for the panel leads to register the panels).
> 
> The two linked above do, they're both mini-conf panel proposals, I
> submitted both a mini-conf proposal and a presentation proposal.

Ah, now I see... Thanks for submitting it in my behalf. I'll double check what's
the better way to adjust your proposals with mine.

Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-25 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-24 20:43 Linux Plumber's Conference: Call for Working Session Submissions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-25 16:10 ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-25 17:35   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-25 18:20     ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-25 18:37       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2010-07-26  8:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-08-19 16:27 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-08-20  8:31   ` Pawel Osciak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C4C846C.90904@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarod@wilsonet.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox