From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28776 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752091Ab0GYShG (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:37:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4C4C846C.90904@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:37:32 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jarod Wilson CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux Plumber's Conference: Call for Working Session Submissions References: <4C4B5077.3020509@redhat.com> <4C4C75F6.8070301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 25-07-2010 15:20, Jarod Wilson escreveu: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: >> Hi Jarod, >> >> Em 25-07-2010 13:10, Jarod Wilson escreveu: >>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>> wrote: >>>> CFP dead line for submitting proposals to LPC/2010 is approaching. >>>> For those that intends to submit proposals for it, please do it quickly, >>>> as the official dead line is July, 26. >>> >>> I've submitted a proposal for a Linux HTPC presentation, intending to >>> cover everything from low-level v4l/dvb drivers, video decoder drivers >>> and IR drivers, up the stack to userspace (primarily mythtv and a bit >>> of xbmc). Also submitted a micro-conf proposal for media-related bits, >>> as I didn't see one yet, and at the time, the proposal submission >>> deadline was only a day or two out (this was before it got extended to >>> the 26th) and I believe you were on vacation, >> >> Good to know. Yes, I was on vacation, just returning back and trying to get rid >> of the immense amount of emails and spams from my inboxes... > > One of the many joys of returning from vacation... :) Yeah... >> To be clear, the dead line for the LPC conf is by July, 26, but we still have >> more time for the mini-conf tracks. >> >>> so your submission and >>> mine are essentially duplicates. >>> >>> http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/proposals/621 >>> http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/proposals/195 >> >> No, they won't conflict. My "proposal" is for leading the mini-conf panel, and not >> for the presentation itself (it is not really a proposal - it is just the way it >> is defined for the panel leads to register the panels). > > The two linked above do, they're both mini-conf panel proposals, I > submitted both a mini-conf proposal and a presentation proposal. Ah, now I see... Thanks for submitting it in my behalf. I'll double check what's the better way to adjust your proposals with mine. Thanks, Mauro