From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5815 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951Ab0IMOZ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:25:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4C8E3460.3050504@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:25:36 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samuel Ortiz CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Richard_R=F6jfors?= , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Media Mailing List , Douglas Schilling Landgraf , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/2] media, mfd: Add timberdale video-in driver References: <1283428572.23309.24.camel@debian> <4C87E67E.2040807@redhat.com> <20100913133951.GD2555@sortiz-mobl> In-Reply-To: <20100913133951.GD2555@sortiz-mobl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: Sender: Em 13-09-2010 10:39, Samuel Ortiz escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:39:42PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 02-09-2010 08:56, Richard Röjfors escreveu: >>> To follow are two patches. >>> >>> The first adds the timberdale video-in driver to the media tree. >>> >>> The second adds it to the timberdale MFD driver. >>> >>> Samuel and Mauro hope you can support and solve the potential merge >>> issue between your two trees. >> >> If the conflicts are trivial, I can handle when merging upstream. > Since the mfd part of this patchset has a build time dependency on the media > part, would you mind pushing both patches upstream through your tree ? > I'll ACK the mfd part. Sure. This is probably a way simpler than the reverse ;) Cheers, Mauro