From: Eino-Ville Talvala <talvala@stanford.edu>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Sung Hee Park <shpark7@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: OMAP 3530 camera ISP forks and new media framework
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:03:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB62CB5.9000706@stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimzU8rR2a0=gTLX8UOxGZaiY0gxx4zTr2VH-iMa@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Laurent, linux-media,
We've been working on porting our OMAP3 ISP/mt9p031 Frankencamera framework forward to the current kernel versions (currently, we're using the N900 ISP driver codebase, which is rather old by now). We'd been following Sakari's omap3camera tree, but as is clear from this discussion, that's a bad idea now.
(I'd love to just send out our mt9p031 driver code, but we still haven't sorted out whether we're free to do so - since we're rewriting it a great deal anyway, it hasn't been a priority to sort out.)
I've been handing off dev work on this to the next set of students on the project, so I haven't been paying much attention to the mailing lists recently, and I apologize if these questions have had clear answers already.
Assuming one has a driver that works fine on the old v4l2_int_framework back in .28-n900 kernel version - what is the best way forward to move it to the 'current best option' framework, whatever that's currently considered to be for the OMAP3 ISP? And for whatever option that is, is there a document somewhere describing what needs to hooked up to what to make that go, or is the best way to just look at the *-rx51 / et8ek8 code in the right git repository?
Any advice would be appreciated!
Eino-Ville Talvala
Camera 2.0 Project
Stanford University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-13 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 9:42 OMAP 3530 camera ISP forks and new media framework Bastian Hecht
2010-10-07 10:58 ` Sakari Ailus
2010-10-07 13:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-07 13:52 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2010-10-07 18:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-10-08 10:46 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-11 12:59 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-11 13:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-11 14:58 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-11 15:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-12 12:10 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-12 12:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-14 13:10 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-14 13:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-12 13:02 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-13 22:03 ` Eino-Ville Talvala [this message]
2010-10-13 22:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-14 5:18 ` Eino-Ville Talvala
2010-10-14 23:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-28 10:28 ` Michael Jones
2010-10-28 13:24 ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-10-11 15:26 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-10-11 16:13 ` Bastian Hecht
2010-10-22 13:54 ` Michael Jones
2010-10-22 14:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB62CB5.9000706@stanford.edu \
--to=talvala@stanford.edu \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shpark7@stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox