From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23953 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980Ab0JQW6Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:58:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4CBB7F7B.9040503@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:58:03 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antti Palosaari CC: LMML Subject: Re: Old patches sent via the Mailing list References: <4CBB689F.1070100@redhat.com> <4CBB7839.5040307@iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <4CBB7839.5040307@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: Em 17-10-2010 20:27, Antti Palosaari escreveu: > On 10/18/2010 12:20 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did a large effort during this weekend to handle the maximum amount of patches, in order to have them >> ready for 2.6.37. While there are still some patches marked as NEW at patchwork, and a few pending pull >> requests (mostly related to more kABI changes), there are still a list of patches that are marked as >> Under review. Except for 4 patches from me, related to Doc (that I'm keeping in this list just to remind >> me that I'll need to fix them when I have some time - just some automation stuff at DocBook), all other >> patches marked as Under review are stuff that I basically depend on others. >> >> The last time I sent this list, I was about to travel, and I may have missed some comments, or maybe I >> may just forgot to update. But I suspect that, for the list bellow, most of them are stuff where the >> driver maintainer just forgot at limbo. >> >>> From the list of patches under review, we have: >> > >> == Waiting for Antti Palosaari review == >> >> Mar,21 2010: af9015 : more robust eeprom parsing http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/87243 matthieu castet > > > Mark as dropped. Done. Thanks!