* [PATCH] v4l-utils: libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR
@ 2010-10-18 12:44 Marc Deslauriers
2010-10-18 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marc Deslauriers @ 2010-10-18 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media; +Cc: marc.deslauriers, hdegoede
libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR
Signed-off-by: Marc Deslauriers <marc.deslauriers@ubuntu.com>
---
lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c b/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
index cb53899..202f020 100644
--- a/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
+++ b/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ static unsigned int palette_to_pixelformat(unsigned
int palette)
case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB565:
return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565;
case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24:
- return V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24;
+ return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24;
case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB32:
- return V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR32;
+ return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB32;
case VIDEO_PALETTE_YUYV:
return V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV;
case VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV422:
@@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ static unsigned int pixelformat_to_palette(unsigned
int pixelformat)
return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB555;
case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565:
return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB565;
- case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24:
+ case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24:
return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24;
- case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR32:
+ case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB32:
return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB32;
case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV:
return VIDEO_PALETTE_YUYV;
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] v4l-utils: libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR
2010-10-18 12:44 [PATCH] v4l-utils: libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR Marc Deslauriers
@ 2010-10-18 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
2010-10-18 14:42 ` Marc Deslauriers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2010-10-18 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Deslauriers; +Cc: linux-media
Hi,
NACK
The byte ordering in v4l1's VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24 was never really
clear, but the kernel v4l1 compatibility ioctl handling has
been mapping VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24 <-> V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24
for ever and many v4l1 apps actually expect VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24
to be BGR24. The only one I know of to get this wrong is camorama
and the solution there is to:
1) not use camorama
2) if you use camorama anyway, fix it, there is a list of patches
fixing various issues available here:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=camorama.git;a=tree
Regards,
Hans
On 10/18/2010 02:44 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Deslauriers<marc.deslauriers@ubuntu.com>
> ---
> lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c b/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
> index cb53899..202f020 100644
> --- a/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
> +++ b/lib/libv4l1/libv4l1.c
> @@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ static unsigned int palette_to_pixelformat(unsigned
> int palette)
> case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB565:
> return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565;
> case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24:
> - return V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24;
> + return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24;
> case VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB32:
> - return V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR32;
> + return V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB32;
> case VIDEO_PALETTE_YUYV:
> return V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV;
> case VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV422:
> @@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ static unsigned int pixelformat_to_palette(unsigned
> int pixelformat)
> return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB555;
> case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565:
> return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB565;
> - case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24:
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24:
> return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24;
> - case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR32:
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB32:
> return VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB32;
> case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV:
> return VIDEO_PALETTE_YUYV;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] v4l-utils: libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR
2010-10-18 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
@ 2010-10-18 14:42 ` Marc Deslauriers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marc Deslauriers @ 2010-10-18 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede; +Cc: linux-media
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:33 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NACK
>
> The byte ordering in v4l1's VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24 was never really
> clear, but the kernel v4l1 compatibility ioctl handling has
> been mapping VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24 <-> V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24
> for ever and many v4l1 apps actually expect VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24
> to be BGR24. The only one I know of to get this wrong is camorama
> and the solution there is to:
> 1) not use camorama
> 2) if you use camorama anyway, fix it, there is a list of patches
> fixing various issues available here:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=camorama.git;a=tree
>
> Regards,
>
I guess you can add sane to the list of apps that actually expect RGB24
to be RGB24. I was trying to debug why colors were inverted in the sane
v4l backend when I did this.
Marc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-18 14:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-18 12:44 [PATCH] v4l-utils: libv4l1: When asked for RGB, return RGB and not BGR Marc Deslauriers
2010-10-18 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
2010-10-18 14:42 ` Marc Deslauriers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox